Please Tell Us Your City

Knowing your city will help us provide relevant content to you.

Sorry! No matching results found. Try again.Error Identifying Your Location.

We won't support this browser soon. For a better experience, we recommend using another browser. Learn More


Ford Figo Diesel Manual vs Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Diesel Manual


Ford Figo Action

Hatchback wars don’t get any better. Being an action-packed segment, every now and then, a car maker shows up with one and sits back to watch how their fortunes unfold. True, added competition gives customers an upper hand, but isn’t that also an opportunity for us to guide our readers to the car of their choice? Exactly, and in this story, we’ve pitted the diesel manual versions of the new Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Asta with the Ford Figo Titanium Blu. What’s coming up next is an in-depth analysis of which car pips ahead of the other.

bell icon
Never miss an update
Receive latest updates from CarWale

Charming Bunch?

Ford Figo Exterior

Although looks are a highly debatable topic, we award the honours straight to the Figo. For one, you tend to look at the Grand i10 Nios and it appears to be a fusion of the Santro and the Grand i10 in large chunks. Not something you’d appreciate considering it is supposed to be a notch higher. Hyundai seems to have clearly lost the opportunity to use its resources to lend this new car an identity of its own.

Ford Figo Exterior

Let’s highlight the best of both cars. The Figo sports sweptback headlamps around the Aston Martin-inspired grille making it the the most desirable portion of this Ford. In the Nios’ case, it is certainly the huge-ass grille that’s seen spanning a sizeable portion of the nose. This is complimented by a pair of cute tear-drop shaped headlamps and creases on the bonnet, fender and lower bumper which should look sporty only to a toddler.

The Living Room

Ford Figo Dashboard

It doesn’t take much effort to realise that the Figo’s dash looks dated. Even the dials on the instrumentation are small and uninspiring. Although quality is par for the course, the same on the Nios, along with its fit and finish, can easily match cars from a segment higher. Add to that, the Nios’ fresh dash design with a dual tone and flowing theme onto the centre console, and you have quite the concoction. In terms of visibility, the Figo’s A-pillar can get in the way of the driver’s view, but the thinner one on the Nios combined with the wider door mirrors makes spotting other motorists an effortless task.

Ford Figo Dashboard

As for storage in the front, the Figo has the upper hand with numerous compartmentalised cubby spaces on the centre console and the front door pads. Interestingly, the Nios fights back with rear doorpad storage and rear ac vents, both of which are sorely missed in the Figo. Space wise, in the front, the Figo offers more legroom, shoulder room and overall larger seats. 

Ford Figo Front-Seats

In comparison, the Nios’ front end entices only if one is taller, and the ingress is much easier. What’s tricky is the rear. If you’re out for more headroom, a larger bench and favourable ingress, the Nios hits that nail. However, the Figo offers marginally more legroom and considerably more space for three occupants.

Ford Figo Rear Seat Space

As much as the seats on both hatches offer good cushioning, the Nios’ front ones lend better lateral support. But, we’d have certainly loved an improved shoulder support on both. As for the rear benches, the one in the Nios offers much more thigh support than the one featured in the Ford, but the latter offers a more appropriate upright backrest angle. Boot-wise, the Nios’ enclosure is wider while the Figo’s enclosure is taller. So, while you can arrange your luggage horizontally in the Hyundai, the Figo allows one to stack it vertically. But what aids luggage loading is the lower boot lip on the Figo.

Ford Figo Boot Space

Well equipped, is it dear?

Ford Figo Instrument Panel

Both the Figo Titanium Blu and Nios Asta are loaded with equipment like a touchscreen infotainment system, automatic climate control, start/stop button, keyless central locking, electrically adjustable ORVMs and more. But ultimately,it’s the Figo that packs more safety and usable features such as six airbags, adjustable front headrests, rain-sensing wipers, automatic head lamps and GPS navigation system. As for the Grand i10 Nios, it gets rear AC vents, a cooled glove-box, smartkey, projector headlamps, LED DRLs, and iPod compatibility.

Ford Figo Dashboard


Ford Figo Action

The Figo gets an advantage on the engine specs front. It’s hard to miss the extra 300cc in its 1.5-litre four-cylinder diesel motor over its counterpart’s 1.2-litre 3-cylinder mill. The Ford also makes an additional 25bhp (99bhp) around 250rpm earlier in the rev-range when compared to the Nios’ 74bhp. Even its 215Nm of torque is higher than the Hyundai’s 190Nm. All said and done, in reality, the superior refinement from the Nios’ three-cylinder motor is truly commendable.

Ford Figo Action

Sure, there’s more buzz from the Figo’s engine, but who cares because there’s so much torque to play with; as early as 1250rpm. And beyond 1500rpm, all you need to do is ride the thick slab of torque that only necessitates the slimmest of throttle inputs. A trait that also aids driving chores, as much as lugging around a cabin-full of passengers. Yes, you notice the lesser pulling power from the Nios’ three-cylinder, but it is in no way inadequate. It’s more than enough for most city driving styles and also when you are out on the highway. 

Ford Figo Action

To give you an idea, the Figo does 0-100kmph in 10.37 seconds, while the Nios manages it in a much slower 12.74 seconds. Understandably, the Figo managed to be quicker in our 20-80kmph and 40-100kmph driveability tests; a good indicator of overtaking capabilities. These are despatched in 10.53 seconds and 11.65 seconds (Figo), while the Nios takes 11.27 seconds and 13.16 seconds. And, if you were thinking about flexibility, both cars can laze around the town at slow speeds in third gear without persisting for downshifts. 

Ford Figo Action

And when the need arises, the Nios’ gear lever is a joy to slot; smooth to operate and takes the effort away. We caught shifting gears just for the heck of it and it is an experience that’s further enriched by its lighter clutch pedal. In comparison, the lever in the Ford is rubbery while going about gearshifts, and there’s some play in the lever itself; quite unlike the crispness of the Nios’. You also need to factor-in the slightly heavier clutch pedal too. 

Twist and Turns

Ford Figo Action

At slow speeds, the ride on the Figo is firm. However as you go faster, the bump absorption improves dramatically, giving it a flat ride. You tend to inevitably appreciate the fact that the Figo is one of the most composed hatches. On the contrary, the same cannot be said about the Nios as the ride is edgy over sharp bumps at low speeds, and there’s some mild suspension noise too. Although the ride does get a bit flatter as one goes faster, it never really feels settled unless you show it a perfectly flat stretch of tarmac (a rarity these days).

Ford Figo Action

As for the steering, the Nios’ had us pleasantly surprised. It is lighter and quicker than the Ford, with less than three turns from lock-to-lock. This also means that parking/manoeuvring in tight spots is certainly easier in the Hyundai. In spite of this, what gives the Figo’s steering more feel, despite not being quicker (more than three turns from lock-to-lock), is not just the extra heft, but also more progression around the dead centre and the better grip from the wider 195/55 R15 tyres (Nios - 175/60/R15). Now, despite running on thinner tyres, the 7kg lighter Nios (1050kg) braked from 80-0kmph in 2.31 seconds, unlike the Figo (1057kg) which took 2.7 seconds.

Kitna deti hain!

Ford Figo Action

In terms of fuel economy, the Nios with its three-cylinder motor has an upper hand. It returned a considerably higher 16.13kmpl and 22.74kmpl in the city and highway run respectively. In comparison, the Figo pulled off the same runs by delivering 14.14kmpl and 19.67kmpl.

Ford Figo Action


Rank 2 Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Asta Points 385

Ford Figo Front Grille

The Hyundai Grand i10 Nios benefits from better interior design, a more efficient and refined diesel engine, considerably higher levels of quality, plus superior fit and finish. However, on the downside, it’s got uninspiring exteriors, an engine that isn’t as powerful, average ride quality and the obvious lack of a few airbags (four to be precise), which is how the Ford raced ahead of it in this test. 

Rank 1 Ford Figo Titanium Blu Points 399

Ford Figo Exterior

Yes, the Ford Figo has its own set of drawbacks. Like the dashboard, which is an eye-sore (to say the least), then, there’s the visibility through the A-pillar which isn’t the best, and it is hard to ignore the absence of rear ac vents. But, essentially, the Figo more than makes up for these by offering better cabin space with comfortable seats, a powerful motor that puts more than a smile on your face, a planted and absorbent ride, and additional safety that comes from four more airbags. All this for around Rs 53,000 cheaper, striking a value-for-money proposition too. Need we really say anything more here!

Pictures by Kapil Angane


CAR NAMEHyundai Grand i10 NiosFord Figo
VariantAsta U2 1.2 CRDiTitanium Blu 1.5 TDCi
InstallationFront, transverseFront, transverse
Displacement3 cyls, 1186cc4 cyls, 1498cc
Power74bhp at 4000rpm99bhp at 3750rpm
Torque190Nm at 1750rpm215Nm at 1750rpm
Power to weight70.47bhp per tonne104.64bhp per tonne
Torque to weight180.95Nm per tonne227.26Nm per tonne
Gearbox5-speed manual5-speed manual
Kerb weight (measured)1050kg1057kg
Tyres175/60 R15195/55 R15
TypeRack and pinionRack and pinion
Type of assistElectricElectric
Turning circle4.84.9

Test Data

CAR NAMEHyundai Grand i10 NiosFord Figo
VariantAsta U2 1.2 CRDiTitanium Plus 1.5 TDCi
20-80kmph in 3rd gear11.2710.53s
40-100kmph in 4th gear13.1611.65s
Tank size37 litres42 litres
Shoulder room1300mm1350mm
Backrest height600mm630mm
Ideal legroom700mm710mm
Shoulder room1190mm1290mm
Seat base length490mm470mm
Backrest height600mm570mm
Boot260 litres257 litres
Loading lip height750mm710mm

Score Sheet

ParametersMax pointsHyundai Grand i10 NiosFord Figo Titanium Blu
Steering response201314
Directional stability251819
Engine characteristics251516
Intermediate results1006869
Front Space251314
Rear space251112
Feeling of space201514
Boot space/flexibility20109
Intermediate results1005757
Comfort equipment251110
Feel of quality201414
Front seats/ingress201515
Rear seat/ingress201413
Intermediate results1006562
Top speed1066
Intermediate results1007079
Ride quality302023
Turning circle151313
Intermediate results1006271
Fuel efficiency352623
Intermediate results1006259
  • FaceBook Logo
  • Twitter Logo
  • Email Logo
bell icon
Never miss an update
Receive latest updates from CarWale



Hyundai Grand i10 Nios Price in India

CityOn-Road Prices
Mumbai₹ 5.95 Lakhs onwards
Bangalore₹ 6.21 Lakhs onwards
New Delhi₹ 5.64 Lakhs onwards
Pune₹ 6.03 Lakhs onwards
Hyderabad₹ 6.03 Lakhs onwards
Ahmedabad₹ 5.79 Lakhs onwards
Chennai₹ 5.92 Lakhs onwards
Kolkata₹ 5.67 Lakhs onwards
Chandigarh₹ 5.68 Lakhs onwards
  • Upcoming Cars

Honda HR-VHonda HR-V

Feb 2020

12L - ₹ 16L
Tata GravitasTata Gravitas

Feb 2020

18L - ₹ 23L
Mercedes-Benz GLC Coupe FaceliftMercedes-Benz GLC Coupe Facelift

3rd Mar 2020

55L - ₹ 80L
BMW X1 FaceliftBMW X1 Facelift

5th Mar 2020

45L - ₹ 55L
Volkswagen Tiguan AllSpaceVolkswagen Tiguan AllSpace

6th Mar 2020

35L - ₹ 40L
All Upcoming Cars

Tips, Advice & Guides

Car tips, advice & guides from our experts

Tips & Advice 
Buying a new Car?Leave a missed call1800 2090 230(Toll free)

Select your city to avail offers

Currently available only in