CarWale
    AD

    Honda WR-V [2017-2020] User Reviews

    Looking for Honda WR-V [2017-2020]? Here are the reviews and ratings by WR-V [2017-2020] owners from across the country.

    WR-V [2017-2020] Image

    4/5

    228 Ratings

    5 star

    49%

    4 star

    25%

    3 star

    11%

    2 star

    7%

    1 star

    7%

    Variant
    S MT Diesel
    Rs. 9,39,573
    Last recorded price

    Categories (out of 5)

    • 4.3Exterior
    • 4.4Comfort
    • 4.0Performance
    • 4.1Fuel Economy
    • 3.9Value for Money

    All Honda WR-V [2017-2020] S MT Diesel Reviews

     (14)
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • 6 years ago | ALOK

      Exterior Focussing of Head light of HONDA WRV are very poor. On low beam, lights are focussing on left side and visibility is poor. As per serive center in Gandhidahm, no provision is provided to adjst the alignment. Honda serives are very poor, no care for customer satisfacton though the service charges are higher in thsi segment. Honda shall learn from Toyota for customer services.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Fuel average shown on displlays does not match with actual fuel consumed. Display is always 10 % more.

      Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality is good, vehicle is stable even at 140 Km speed.

      Final Words Drive is smooth, body is strong.

      Areas of improvement Head light, back seat, AC VENT, BACK SEAT CONMFORT, Rear AC vent, Head rest for back seat, Proper locking for cover provided on lock of back door, Improvement required for smoothening of gear box, Additional features like outside temperature, engine temperature required, Fog light shall be essental in all model, Rear view camera or sensors shall be included in all the models.

      Good on highways drivingPoor head light
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage18 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 4 years ago | Barath
      Honda WRV Diesel.... the best of this segment..it has all the features required...fuel economy... comfort... safety... love this car...it is more of a family vehicle... Unlike Eco sport...where we can enjoy performance...
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 6 years ago | Pratik

      Exterior Really cool, refreshing a head turner.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Best in segment overall.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Its good but i think the bhp should have been atleast 110, maybe next version may have it increased, but still better than brezza, drove brezza with 4 onboard it doesnt pull fair it felt as dull, drove wrv with same 4 onboard power is better in all gears, maruti's diesel engines below 2000 rpm feels damped and all then all of a sudden its zippy which is not good, plus 1258 cc doesnot do justice in pulling more wieght. honda cars come very close to arai feul efficiency figures and wrv is no different. gear liver is sporty and throws are slick.

      Ride Quality & Handling Relatively lower ground clearence yet enough for indian roads the ride and handling is good, amazing suspension for front but ok at rear as its a drivers car.

      Final Words Overall vfm and its better than its rival in maximum scenarios.

      Areas of improvement Little piano finish materials should make dash look good and glove box shld be air cooled.

      design, space, mielage, engineground clearence should have been atleast 195+,60:40 seats missing, rear arm rest missing
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forDid a short drive once
      Mileage22 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 6 years ago | Dhande Kamlakar P

      Very poor colour quality. No headrest for rear seats. Suspension is hard. Car is almost jumping and very uneasy fill for rear user. Headlight poor. Rear parking camera should have sound sensor. Fuel efficiency 17km/lit for diesel variant on highway. Very annoying experience as compared to other SUV.

      NANA
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      2

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      2

      Fuel Economy


      2

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      1
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Nitmit Dave

      It is nice car. Best mileage in its segment of 25 kmpl Only car having sunroof in this segment. Performance like SUV. Sturdy look nice headlamps Cabin light is more than enough. Rear seat space makes u feel like a Jaguar. What missing is only back armrest. Front arm rest provided but not sufficient.

      NANA
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      1
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 4 years ago | Jaspreet
      Nice car, 20km average, Ac needs some improvement, comfort ok, pickup excellent, all features under 11lakh,no problem in space, love the car, as good as breeza, creta, drove all 3.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      1
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Hiren Patel
      1. It's just name honda not more then. 2. After 15000km running in Ahmedabad city I found wr-v name meaning (worst vahical) 3. It has just milage not more then as per customer thinking like built quantity, reliability, customer care service and etc. 4. Dealer serverd best but company product not good. 5. Pros only and only milage not thinks more then this but Cons when we buy one car for comfort we never think about engine we looking for comfort that can't match wr-v
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      1

      Exterior/Styles


      1

      Comfort & Space


      2

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      2

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      1
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 5 years ago | Aravind KV Bhupathiraju
      I have driven WRV diesel which belongs to my friend for around 500kms. Riding experience is not at all a bad one. But Honda needs to focus a lot on WRV. Cons: 1.5 liter engine for petrol is good than 1.2 liter petrol engine. 1.5 liter diesel engine needs to be more refined and cabin insulation must be improved Automatic variant is most important as people are showing more intrest in AT cars. Seats needs to be improved as more than 6 feet height person have some discomfort while driving. Safety also needs to be improved a lot. Overall Honda needs to concentrate more on WRV where the era of compact SUV is in boom.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      1

      Comfort & Space


      2

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forFew hundred kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Manoj
      I was looking for Brezza and Creta as an option for Compact SUV requirement. I rejected Brezza because of the same century-old engine of 1248CC which I was already using in Dzire. I test drive it and didn't find any difference. At least they would have matured a little bit. Creta falls in upper side providing no extra benefit friendly speaking. I found Honda WRV lying in between providing high-value engine and all options which you can imagine in this budget SUV. I test drive it and the 1498cc engine had enough punch to make my interest with other benefits like Sun Roof, Ground Clearance of 188mm equal to Creta (190mm), Cruise Control and 7'' Touch Panel. The look is also impressive and dynamic so definitely one can go for it if looking for compact SUV with good value for money.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      4

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Hiren Patel

      The only engine are good otherwise wr-v product build quality is worst then Fiat very noisy suspension in the smooth road I ride this car in Ahmadabad road this area good for infrastructures so the company has no Amy excuse for the road built quality.

      NANA
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      1

      Exterior/Styles


      1

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew hundred kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0

    Reviews you may also consider

    AD
    Write Review
    Write a detailed review of a car and you can
    scissors image
    Win Amazon Voucher worth
     ₹
    2000

    Want to read the reviews for any other car?