Nissan Terrano [2013-2017] User Reviews

Exterior NA.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) NA.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox My TERRANO IS NOT MOVING AFTER JUST 500 KM. COMPANY NOT Able TO RECTIFY PROBLEM  even after 12 days. GOd KNOWs how the company is running.

Ride Quality & Handling NEW TERRANO PETROL VEHICLE IS DOWN AND COMPANY NOT ABLE TO SET IT RIGHT AFTER 12 DAYS. WORST PRODUCT.

Final Words WORST Quality of TERRANO AND WORST AFTER SALES SERVICE.

Areas of improvement THERE IS NO AFTER SALES SERVICE. MY NEW TERRANO IS WITH COMPANY FOR LAST 12 DAYS  and company is not able to set it RIGHT. There is no communication from company side. I am running pillar to post to get it back. A complete harrassment after spending 11 LAcs. No sight of vehicle getting back. No escalation of officers are provided. breaking head with customer care people. I had sent mails to senior officers but no one is taking resposibility and responding. It seems that I am cheated in broad daylight, company robbed Rs 11 Lacs and not returning my vehicle.

good exteriorWORST AFTER SALES SERVICE:- POOR Quality

Exterior

1) state of the Art.

2) Best look in SUV.

3) Its Better than bulky XUV500 which is sort ofr oil burner.

4) Its value for money.

5) At highway its showing a 22.5 Average , Its Engine is very Solid.

Only Service issue i heard in feedback but in Delhi i dont face any issue of now.

I am very happy with product.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Better than Duster, very Smooth and confortable.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Engine noise is less than Duster, 20KMPL Avg.

Ride Quality & Handling

1) Easy to handle as compared to Bulky XUV500.

2) If You want take the pleasure of SUV without burning of so much fuel the GO for Terrano.

Final Words If You want take the pleasure of SUV without burning of so much fuel the GO for Terrano.

Areas of improvement  

1) Add Projector Head Lamps

2) Add Dead Peadle

3) seconf row seat should be movable 60:40

4) Add DRL in head light

5) Add Only Cruise contrl on steering wheel.

Average 20(City) and 22.1(Highway), Ample space in Boot, Second row seat has enough spaceSteering option are not there, but it rarely used

Exterior Terrano looks very attractive when compared to Duster. It might be the fact that Nissan has tried to show that terrano is superior to Duster with increased price. As far looks are concerned, the the increased price is worth.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) But inner looks are very common. The comfort is important when you spend 13.50 lacs. The NO mark you will find more in a coloumn of features they offer. So the question is why they fix such a high price which is beyond the limit of middle class man. the space is good, which you can also find in any car below 8 lacs. Just we call terrano SUV is a difference.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox This SUV is fuel economic, when you take the claim of Nissan into consideration. But users experience is somewhat disappointing. You can notice the vehicle makes noise simply standing out. Even better engine technology than Dci could have been provided.

Ride Quality & Handling Excellent when you sit on driving sean more pleasure can be found. 

Final Words Very good SUV than Duster, ecosport but either price could habe been reduced or more features been provided.

Areas of improvement Interior, engine technology.

Better looks outsideVery common looks inside

Exterior Exterior made me attracted compared to Duster which had some thing incomplete in style. Looks premium than Duster, especially I like the wheel cover front grill(taken from Nissan Patrol) rear door etc. From all angles the vehicle looks really nice. From side view it is similar to Duster.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) I felt front AC vent has improved design, plastic quality little but not that much rest is the same like Duster.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Engine sound some what reduced compared to Duster. Fuel economy is good from my initial Ride, Gear box there is an improvement in 2 and 3 rd gear compared to Duster.

Ride Quality & Handling Awesome ride quality and handling, but during overtake I need to shift to 4th Gear which I felt some thing difficult but better than Duster.

Final Words If your budget is 11 ~ 14 better go for this car since this is improved version of Duster. If the budget is tight better go for Duster.

Areas of improvement Price has to be less.

Good stylePrice

Bought a new Terrano 85 PS Top end model in the month of September 2014. I always liked the looks of the Terrano when compared to the Duster and you can easily make out the difference in the quality of plastic used betwen a Terrano and a Duster.

Was a bit skeptical on moving from a small hatchback to an SUV and from petrol to Diesel but one test drive of the Terrano was all it took the decide and i was more than happy with the car.

I was really happy with the overall buying experience with Surya Nissan dealer, bangalore eventhough i had read a lots of negative reviews about them. I'm sure they have worked on their negative reviews.

Immediately after the car delivery i went on a 3 day vacation to chikmagalur with my family and really enjoyed driving this car. Be it the wonderful highway between Bangalore and Hassan or the literally non-existent roads to the homestay where we stayed , the Terrano never complained. The overall driving experience so far has been fabulous and if you ask me was it worth the extra 30-40k spent compared to Duster ?? I bet it was!!

Exterior: 

Stylish exterior. Need to be a little careful while driving in  a crowded street and keep in mind the extra bulge of the wheel arcs/hubs or whatever its called.

 

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

 Features: Needs lot of improvement. Would atleast expect a climate control and steering mounted controls when spending 13+ lakhs.

Space: I'm 6 feet tall and even after pushing the drivers seat back my mom was able to comfotably sit in the back seat with enough space between her legs and the front seat.

Comfort: Needless to say it's very comfortable and the outdoor noise is almost nil even when you are driving at over 110KMPH.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

 Engine Performance & Gearbox: I felt the 2nd gear is a little sluggish till it hits certain RPM especially since i upgradedf from a petrol car i felt this a bit annoying. But once a certain RPM crosses it's a "Smooth Operator"

Fuel Economy: I covered around 800Kms and the onboard computer shows the mileage to be around 16.5 KMPL. I'm sure it would vary after the first service.

Ride Quality & Handling

 Ride Quality: Outstanding. No bad roads are bad enough for the Terrano especially with the 16" alloys

Handling: No problems with the handling at all. Be it bumper to bumper traffic or the highway maneouvers

Final Words

I would request people buying a duster to just have a test drive of Terrano before making a decision. You are sure to get into a dilemma :)

 

Areas of improvement  

 

 

Good Style, Awesome Boot space, Great ground clearance. Ease of drivingExtra features might have been provided for the price

Beside having tough completion in segment ,Nissan terrano stand tall in terms of Performance, Handling, value for Money keeping the brand value live. Have driven the car for than 1 lac kms, no issues so far.

Nice car , for Long drive it's best., ac very nice, mileage is good, interior is very good, nice pickup, I really enjoy my driving, maintenance is reasonable , seating is very comfortable overall I like so much.

Exterior Exterior is good and stylish.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Very spacous and comfortabl seats. But lack of features is the worst thing with this vehicle. It is very mean that a compact SUV costing this much is not provided with a rear view camera, controls on steerig wheel, GPS, a good music system or even good lighting on the dash board. The dash board does not have a suitable place even for my Mobile while charging. The lack of GPS and steering controls is too inconvenient in long drives. Even the floor matt is too mean.

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Fuel economy is fantastic. I get 19 to 20 Km per litre at 90 Kms/ hour with AC on. I am happy for that. Engine performance is good. Steering is smooth. But the accessories lke Brakes are a Dampner. The rear brake liners ncluding the brake pistons came out completetly in just two years at the first rains eventhough my daily running is not more than 5 Km. And the service centre charged me Rs 15000/= even though I had an extended Warranty. Mind you it was not a normal wear and tear.

Ride Quality & Handling NA.

Final Words Even thouh the Vehicle is OK, the attitude durng purchase as well as service was very mean and cold. Service centre chaps ay that they dont get anything from the company for niceties. I didnt get even a tea at the service centre. What I got as a gift during purchase was two pillows. Ha Ha Ha.

Areas of improvement NA.

Spacious, good riding after 60 km speed,No additional fetures, No control on steering wheel, No rear view camera, absolutely cold aproach

I brought the top end model of Nissan Terrano when it was launched in the yr. 2013. No doubt I was extremely stunned by its fabulous Exteriors but I was let down by the "poor quality of plastics" interiors used by a Japanese company like Nissan. The seating arrangement is also not very comfortable. The seats are normal seats like any other standard Jeep but not as comfortable as they are in Skoda or Swift cars. The breaking is poor & the vehicle skids to either left or right when breaks are applied at high speet. The doors are very lite weight.  The pick up is very poor in hilly terrains. I was so disappointed by its overall performance that I sold it after only 6 months thus incurring heavy monetary loss, as it has got a very bad resale price in the market. 

My advice to all the people out there is "DON'T EVEN THINK ABOUT IT"

SHEERU PURI.

SPACE IS GOOD, EXTERIOR IS GOOD, MUSIC SYSTEM IS GOOD, POWER STEERING IS GOODSMELLY INTERIORS, POOR QUALITY PLASTIC USED, VERY POOR BREAKING, SEATING UNCOMFORTABLE,