एमजी हेक्टर vs निसान एक्स-ट्रेल [2009-2014]

7 Ratings

2 Ratings

Class in your budget. MG Hector MT turbo 1.5l review

The vehicle is sturdy and the in city refinement is just unbelievable. Space and seats are very comfortable. The back seats become total flat and makes it boot space double for easy movement of luggage also. I am getting mileage of 10.9 to 12 within city in bumper to bumper traffic. Don't expect xuv700 kind of driving experience in high way but with 250nm torque it does pack quit a punch. Loving it.

Great engine

<p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Exterior</strong> Looks good, muscular good overall visibility.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> Good seats,poor audio, no usb port for audio,no reverse parking sensor(can be a pain in city)terribly expensive parts with sixty day waiting, ie an alloy spare wheel for the spare wheel costs thirty five thousand rs, cheaper to buy four spare alloy wheel from after market. Front head lamps in non xenon model is inadequate, fogging of windshield is common during rain even with the heater on in kerala rains.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Great engine,gear box suspension and no body roll .good mileage at hundred km to six and half liters of reliance diesel.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Good ride no roll,good accelaration,good brakes, bridgestone tyres have a good mileage {done twenty five thousand km and still should go another twenty.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p> <p><strong>Final Words </strong>Avoid buying&nbsp; tghe car, spare parts not available,have to come fron japan sixty min days according to dealer evm nissan kochi,frightfully expenve parts.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>Great enginepoor audio,no reverse parking sensors, terribly expensive parts