CarWale
    AD

    Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016] User Reviews

    Looking for Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016]? Here are the reviews and ratings by Quanto [2012-2016] owners from across the country.

    Quanto [2012-2016] Image

    3.3/5

    87 Ratings

    5 star

    14%

    4 star

    36%

    3 star

    28%

    2 star

    14%

    1 star

    9%

    Variant
    C6
    Rs. 8,03,155
    Last recorded price

    Categories (out of 5)

    • 3.8Exterior
    • 3.8Comfort
    • 3.6Performance
    • 3.4Fuel Economy
    • 3.7Value for Money

    All Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016] C6 Reviews

     (14)
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • 5 years ago | Poonam kumari
      I was thinking of buying the ertiga but quanto cost lesser than ertiga and i was on budget of 6 to 7 lakh that's why i bought this. This car offers very good amount of space and comfort.It has adequate performance and good mileage. It has good practical features like the hidden storage place under front seats or the jump seat in the boot. Overall it has all daily use feature. But it lacks many important thinks like- This car doesn't look stylish. It has bumpy ride quality after 40km/h. It's fit and finish is not very good. It feels bulky to drive in city. It could have better interiors. After 5 years now i think that i should took a loan and bought ertiga. I don't know about the service because i have driven it only 10000km in 5 years.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      2

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      4

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      2
    • 11 years ago | Nitesh Raman

      Exterior

      Exterior seems to be very Good. Liked it very much as compare it with the Ertiga. Style is new or we can say that it is mini Xylo with added falvours.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

       Interior is very good with nice features. Seems having all the features that a competetior car having in it's top model. Space seems to be less as compare with Ertiga. Also, overall length is less in MUV class.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

       Fuel economy is OK.

      Ride Quality & Handling

       N/A

      Final Words

       As concluded from the comparison, this is the value for money car and may be the cheapest in it's segment with such features and style. Space seems to be less as per overall length and 07 seats. Interior is good with nice features.

      Areas of improvement  

       Ground Clearance to be improved. Seems to be clearance is very less as compare with overall hieght of the car.

       

      Good Style as compare with ErtigaOverall Length is less as compare with Ertiga.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forHaven't driven it
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 11 years ago | Kannan

      Exterior Decent and stylish.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good space, easy to hold loads luggages in the rear.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Avg fuel economy shows 18 to 20 sometimes 22 on highway rides. good to believe if its true.

      Ride Quality & Handling Good comfort, second row seats could have been with reclining option, but considering the sub 4m, it may not have been possible. AC for middle row was a problem, it hardly was reaching. after the first service it was rectified and is very effiecient now.

      Final Words Very good value for money for those looking at a big car with lots of space, decent practical comfort, ride quality.

      Areas of improvement Rear door gets shaky, i had this once and got it tightened, the problem is regurring again, possibly due to teh heavy weight of the door. Wipers are of poor quality.

      Space, featuresless comfort in middle row, minor troubles with rear door after long usage
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage17 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 10 years ago | Rajkumar

      Exterior Looks like a mini Xylo/ blood brother of Xylo, but not as good as Xylo exterior.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Here the Quanto catches everyone with its features at this price tag, where arm rest for front seats, ABS, Rear Washer with Defogger, DTE,AVG Mileage, AC meter, but the auto stop/start system provided is nuisance. Also the space and comfort in the first and middle row is excellent but third row is strictly suitable for 5.5 or Kids.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Engine is really smooth and hard enough to handle the roads with its twin turbo, but still there is a lag till 1500 rpm, but after that u can fly with your vehicle by keeping others in your rear view mirror except the previous model SWIFT diesels as thier ride and handling is different and gem while comparing in this price tag. Decent Fuel economy for SUV i.e is 11-12kms/ltr in city with 100% AC and 16-17Kms/ltr in Highways with 100% AC. Gear Box is reasonably smooth but not as good as Premium hatchbacks/sedans.

      Ride Quality & Handling Bumpy Ride even on a little humps and in speed breakers, with an avg speed of 60-65kmps Cornering confidence is good since its a tall boy and normally tall boys not be stable as one of the hatchbacks/sedans due to shorter wheelbase and width.  Body roll is there and one must have to take the test drive before going into it.

      Final Words Reasonalbe VFM, Suitable for Joyfull weekends, if little bit Ride quality and handling is improved in quanto then surely there will be a waiting period equalent to swift @ sales.

      Areas of improvement Ride and handling, A.S.S, quality of interior plastics, and overall exterior looks.

      Twin Turbo System, Excellent spare wheel cover/design, Features provided.Body Roll, Bumpry Ride and Cheap quality of Interiors with Sharp edges.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage15 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0

    Reviews you may also consider

    AD
    Write Review
    Write a detailed review of a car and you can
    scissors image
    Win Amazon Voucher worth
     ₹
    2000

    Want to read the reviews for any other car?