CarWale
    AD

    Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016] User Reviews

    Looking for Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016]? Here are the reviews and ratings by Quanto [2012-2016] owners from across the country.

    Quanto [2012-2016] Image

    3.3/5

    87 Ratings

    5 star

    14%

    4 star

    36%

    3 star

    28%

    2 star

    14%

    1 star

    9%

    Variant
    C4
    Rs. 7,54,286
    Last recorded price

    Categories (out of 5)

    • 3.8Exterior
    • 3.8Comfort
    • 3.6Performance
    • 3.4Fuel Economy
    • 3.7Value for Money

    All Mahindra Quanto [2012-2016] C4 Reviews

     (9)
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • All
    • 5
    • 4
    • 3
    • 2
    • 1
    Sort by :
    • 11 years ago | Yogesh Kamboj

      Exterior Exterior is nice and has fresh look to the usual SUV hence can be found to be attractive and a head turner.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Loaded with features like DIS system which is very useful showing mileage, speed , directions, etc.also arm rest in front for both gives a good feel.

      Space is good for front seats just like Xylo, dashboard can be counted in acres, rear seat comfort on other hand is veryt great, a 6` person seating in fornt can leave leg room for rear passenger, rear seat are too hard & straight for longer drives & also do not recline due to baby rear most seats which are not for adults & can get clostrofobic in those side facing seats.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Pick up is awesome 1st gear can reach 40kms, 2gear 70kms, least turbo lag, very smooth acceleration & does not at all feel underpowered but then it needs to be checked for 7seating with ac on a up hill.

      Gear shifting is very smooth & gives a positive feel. the torque is very good & u don`t need to shift down for overtaking even in 4th gear.

      Ride Quality & Handling Ride quality what I found was hard for rear person can feel smallest humps on the road as the seats are given too much height,

      Final Words A good innovation but lacks proper execution.

      Areas of improvement REAR SEAT COMFORT.

      Handling, At Corners, Handling at Truning at curves, Smooth ride,Style SittingNothing
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Not Purchased
      Driven forDid a short drive once
      Mileage17 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      10
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 11 years ago | Honey

      Exterior Dashing like SUV in such a price . Specially the back look is excellent, the height of car is also nearly to xylo.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Not bad but still the copy of xylo but fit for this price tag.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Already purchased Quanto last week, everything is OK but for fuel on road is nearly 15 and in city it gives 12-13 with AC.

      Ride Quality & Handling Superb already have renault duster feels same while riding both car and Duster is already high in price for about 2.5 lakhs than quanto.

      Final Words Finally saying that the renault dealers have no commitment about delievery , the car launched for Test drive at 7th July , I already booked on 26 th June , their commitment was to give the car before 30th July but they have given me on 27th August, many people were fighting for delievery period dealers booked the model RXe but not a single car delievered by company. Serviced duster at 1000kms not as per commitment but still not serviced my mahindra ,expecting better service than renault as its my first experience with both the Suvs. I think Mahindra Quanto is value for Money . Excellent job done by Mahindra.

      Areas of improvement Interiors.

      Everything excellent in low budgetinteriors not really good
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew hundred kilometers
      Mileage15 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      3
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 5 years ago | Vishal Bhise
      Riding experience: It feels driving a truck with the kind of viberations
      Details about looks, performance etc: The word PERFORMANCE does not suit the car in anyways.
      Servicing and maintenance: Never satisfactory, its just shelling out money from the pocket
      Pros and Cons: I hate everything about this car, I hate my self for buying this car
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      1

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Used
      Driven forIts my mate since ages
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      3
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 11 years ago | W.R.David

      Exterior The looks are not very pleasing as a car.but we get used to it .People give second looks.It is too tall but not proportional to length.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Very good space,cup holders and all pouches trays and all.I feel plastic quality as good as Dezire.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Good the engine has good torque and pickup is good the hybrid stuff is very nice.

      Ride Quality & Handling Not very but as long as you dont go too fast max 80-90 km/h it is fine.The seats are hard and needs good seat covers.

      Final Words If you are planning to buy Dezire or Etios dont I would advice you to go for this.Though the jump seats are not very comfortable you dont no when you will require them so it is very practical.The overall package is good but if you are more of a speed guy and if you enjoy fast cars then this is not for you if you like to travel an if you enjoy the journey more than the destination well then this is the car for you.

      Areas of improvement Body roll better suspension seats should be more plush.

      SPACE, SUV LOOKS, MILEAGE,RUGGEDNESSBODY ROLL
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      5

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage17 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 10 years ago | Gopal Chaladi

      Exterior

      Over all design is good, my main concern is its tyres. It should have atleast 16 inch. Should have given more ground clearence.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

       Its a mini SUV. When its come to space its nice. 3 big people sit comfortbully in middle row. last 2 seats we didnt used much but twice or trice no complaints. If last 2 seats are ditachable I will be more happy.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

       Driving is smooth, and engine is powerful.

      Its 8lakhs SUV/Car and its fuel economy just 11-12 kms in city and got max 15.7 kms on highways.

      Ride Quality & Handling

       No words, just perfect.

      Final Words

       As fello reviewer said "A good innovation but lacks proper execution".

      First its a great car in terms of performance and interior space. We are of big family looking for atleast 7 seater and Quanto seems right one for us with 5+2 seats option, Basically a 5 seater buthad 2 extra seats when necessary. I am a big person 105kgs with5.10 height I comforibly sat in last 2 seats for 4 hours drive without problem. So you dont have to ask more. Only problem is with packed car AC didnt reached last seats as expected.

      I had done so much research before buyin this, as a big family my requirements are 5+2 seating and fuel economy and shuld less than 9 lakhs. This will help you people

      Nissan Evaliya/Ashok Leland Style: 20kmpl, Big Interiors, best in the category but above 10 lakhs
      Chevi Enjoy : 17kmpl, just ok interiors minimun 9 lakhs onroad. Its a people mover than family car.
      Quanto : 17kmpl, Sub 4 meter car so easy to drive and park, actually 5 seater with 2 seats extra, 7.5  - 10Lakhs
      Honda Mobilio: 25kmpl, Actually I want to buy this but still not released.

      Areas of improvement  

      Fuel economy should atleast 15kmpl in city.

      Tyres should be atleast 16inch that improves ground clearence too.

       

      Design and style, interior space, Yoga seats, robust car at this priceSmall tyres, pigmy look, Fuel Economy in city 11 kms
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      3

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage12 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 2 years ago | Vaideeshwaran
      Driving experience is good, mileage, maintenance cost is low, comfortable for long ride, excellent performance, perfect seven seater, riding experience on hills is good.
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      5

      Exterior/Styles


      5

      Comfort & Space


      5

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      5

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase Used
      Driven forHaven't driven it
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      2
      DisLike Button
      1
    • 11 years ago | Vinith

      Exterior Very good exterior, poor indicators ever reflect. Very dangerous to park with out parking lights on. The dirt behind the tyre are always seen, no proper covering between the tyre and the body. No mud flaps for rear tyre, will make the car dam dirty.

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Very good, but c4 does not have hand rest for the driver. Driving without handrest is very difficult. Even that is not available in accessories. Mahindra should really look into it.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Very good engine performance, poor millage. Hardly it is 12 in city and 14 in Highway. No way the top gear can be used in city.

      Ride Quality & Handling Very good for the initial payment, after that you will be left with no option but to live as they don’t provide the required accessories for C4. Wish they do it.

      Final Words As long as you don’t worry for paying for fuel, pl go ahead, its good!!!

      Areas of improvement Availability of accessories, millage.

      Very good innovative vehicle, good performance in HighwaysMissed a lot of feature, The indicators are not reflective, no mud flaps, no mileage, poor drive in
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      4

      Comfort & Space


      3

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      2

      Fuel Economy


      3

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forIts my mate since ages
      Mileage13 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      1
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 11 years ago | Hari Singh Hada

      Exterior is very good looking , smart compact urban SUV body, feels like riding SUV, plastic used inside the interior is not upto the mark, vibrates of shaky and bumpy roads, road clearance is good enough, performance of engine is good, Economical if terms of fuel consumption, Excellant running of highways, Ride smooth on highways but little difficult on bumpy roads, last rear seats as not suitable for adults, only childred in emergency can be sitted, AC require some improvement and rear seat is not feeling comfortable with the performance.

      Long ride abount 600-700 kms in Haryana Rajasthan without any break and feel comfortable with the car, only bumpy roads may cause inconvinenace due to high seating. Suspension may be improved so that minimum jerks to the passeger on rear seats.  Mahindra has overlook the  comfort of passenger, middle  seat should be more comfortable and it should be make foldable so that boot space increase if  require.

      Improvement required:  suspension and interior.

      Overall Performance: Very Good, Value to money.

      Budget Urban SUV, Open new segement in Indian marketPoor plastic used in interiors
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      4

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      4

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      4

      Fuel Economy


      4

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage18 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • 8 years ago | Ramesh

      Exterior Different design, no particular problem 

      Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Extra seats in the rear are basically useless. The size of the seats is very small and the space around it is very small. It is not good enough to sit and not good enough to keep luggage.

      Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox Very good pickup, but terrible mileage. Tested on 18.07.15 in early morning when traffic was scanty. Mileage did not exceed 11.60 kms per litre without A/c. Even on long distance driving on highways, mileage was 11.96 with A/c. 

      Ride Quality & Handling Rocks from side to side and throws a persons from side to side while negotiating small slopes and throws you up into the air on speed bumbs even with careful driving

      Final Words If you want fuel efficient vehicle, purchase some other vehicle. Cheaper diesel, is offset by poor mileage of the vehicle. 

      Areas of improvement Mileage improvement and smoothness is needed while driving over bumbs/slopes. The middle seat also has space at the bottom, which allows things to roll over to the front.

      Spacious, different design, excellent pickupPoor mileage, rocking motion while going down slopes, fails to smoothly negotiate bumps
      Rating parameters(out of 5)
      3

      Exterior/Styles


      3

      Comfort & Space


      1

      Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)


      1

      Fuel Economy


      1

      Value for Money/Features

      About the Reviewer
      Purchase New
      Driven forFew thousand kilometers
      Mileage12 kmpl
      Was this review helpful?
      Like Button
      0
      DisLike Button
      0
    • Back
    • 1
    • Next

    Reviews you may also consider

    AD
    Write Review
    Write a detailed review of a car and you can
    scissors image
    Win Amazon Voucher worth
     ₹
    2000

    Want to read the reviews for any other car?