மாருதி சுஸுகி பிரெஸ்ஸா vs நிசான் டெர்ரானோ [2013-2017]

26 Ratings

6 Ratings

Low mileage

At the buying, I was excited dealer put a condition to purchase accessories of 70000 for delivery Driving experience in satisfactory Look is excellent and the performance is not according to the price Service is so poor and a lot of rush Only looks are good Average per km is so poor only 14.25 kms per litre on highway with a speed of 60 to 85 kms per hour

Terrano Will overtake Duster

<p><strong>Exterior</strong> Exterior made me attracted compared to Duster which had some thing incomplete in style. Looks premium than Duster, especially I like the wheel cover front grill(taken from Nissan Patrol) rear door etc. From all angles the vehicle looks really nice. From side view it is similar to Duster.</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong> I felt front AC vent has improved design, plastic quality little but not that much rest is the same like Duster.</p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox</strong> Engine sound some what reduced compared to Duster. Fuel economy is good from my initial Ride, Gear box there is an improvement in 2 and 3 rd gear compared to Duster.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong> Awesome ride quality and handling, but during overtake I need to shift to 4th Gear which I felt some thing difficult but better than Duster.</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong> If your budget is 11 ~ 14 better go for this car since this is improved version of Duster. If the budget is tight better go for Duster.</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong> Price has to be less.</p>Good stylePrice