மாருதி சுஸுகி பலேனோ vs செவ்ரோலெ ஆப்ட்ரா [2005-2007]

25 Ratings

1 Rating

Value for money

Buying experience is just like average It's really amazing while only two person in car but not well in 5 Look is good and performance is an average experience Service of Maruti is average but it's not cost too much high There are various pros such as power window auto AC and so on There are various items missing in Sigma model such as steering mounting controls rear AC.

worst car in this segment

<p><strong>Exterior</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;Good&nbsp;&nbsp; 'BUT DON'T GO BY SIMPLY LOOKS LOOK FOR PERFORMANCE exterior start getting rusted after 2 years 'Body sheet&nbsp; used is of very thin and of poor quality</p> <p><strong>Interior (Features, Space &amp; Comfort)</strong></p> <p><strong>Engine Performance, Fuel Economy in looks&nbsp;and Gearbox</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;POOR gives only 5-6 km/ltr.</p> <p><strong>Ride Quality &amp; Handling</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;fair</p> <p><strong>Final Words</strong></p> <p>&nbsp;DONT WAIST MONEY JUST FOR NAME OF GM .TAKE MY WORDS I AM ACTUAL USER&nbsp;AND A SUFFERER OF&nbsp;CHEVY OPTRA&nbsp; it IS REALLY BAD . NOT WORTH FOR PRICE BAD AFTERSALES SERVICE AND BAD PERFORMANCE. THERE AFTERSALES 3 YEAR CONTRACT IS JUST A EYE WASH.DEALERS&nbsp;AVOID REPLACEING PARTS DURING WARRANTY PERIOD AND MOMENT WARRANTY IS OVER YOU WILL FIND YOU NEED REPLACEMENT FOR ALL IMPORTANT PARTS.TILL DATE I FEEL SORRY FOR DECIDING FOR OPTRA CHEVORLET.PETROL</p> <p><strong>Areas of improvement</strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;IN ALL DEPARTMENTS SPECIALLY IN FUEL ECONOMY AND BODY QUALITY.HAVE KEPT SO FAR 9 CARS IN ALL BUT YET TOO SEE BAD QUALITY AS OF CHEVEORLET OPTRA.</p> <p>&nbsp;</p>good stylethis car is good for max 2 years thereafter itsbody get rusted suspension is finish low fuel milag