Ford Fiesta [2011-2014] User Reviews

All Ford Fiesta [2011-2014] Titanium+ Petrol [2011-2014] Reviews

(2)

All
5
4
3
2
1

Sort by :

All
5
4
3
2
1

Sort by :

Good looking bad car
10 years ago | Kishan Rao
Exterior

Good styling and looks, front shape is excellent but bit odd styling from the rear.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

Front seats comfortable, rear seats very uncomfortabe with bad head retraints and very poor space. full of other features . Player cannot be replaced and is built in to the dash. has elcectronic folding side mirrors, cruise control etc

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

Engine performance, just average and feels underpowevered and yet bad mileage. Gearbox is good with smooth shifts.

Ride Quality & Handling

Ride quality is very power if you are at he back, very stiff low speed ride. Handling is good . Driving on winding roads is cool. However car being underpowevered handling could be better.

Final Words

Not worth at all if you are chauffer driven, good car to drive, but feels underpowered.

Areas of improvement

Rear seat space, rear seat comfort, rear head restraints, improvement in power, better ride at slow speeds, rear shape,width of the seats so that 3 people can be accomodated in the rear etc

Styling, handlingRear seat space, comfort, very stiff slow speed ride, not adequate power
Rating parameters(out of 5)
3
Exterior/Styles
1
Comfort & Space
2
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
1
Fuel Economy
1
Value for Money/Features
About the Reviewer
Purchase New
Driven forFew thousand kilometers
Mileage6 kmpl
Read More
Was this review helpful?
1
1
ford fiesta competitor to verna
12 years ago | Ryan Malhotra
Exterior

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort)

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox

noise less, good power with 1.5 lit , nice smooth pickup, smooth and stable drive, good steering control not hard as told by many, nice braking system, shock absorbers are bit disaapointment but same as that of verna fluidic.

Ride Quality & Handling

nice experience

Final Words

i test drove both verna fluidic and ford fiesta. as far as drive is concerned both were same but still there is a big question mark on korean made engine performance in long run as many people still dont beleive in korean make and this thinking is same everywhere in india from north to south which force me to to rethink over hyundai becouse there is no smoke without fire.

verna fluidic is studded with features which ford fiesta has not included. again the pricing of ford is higher than verna. rear space is less but i have not compared with verna so i cant tell. the biggest disappointment about verna is its looks. although ford fiesta nad verna has fuidic design but ford definitly looks better than verna and the rear view is bad in case of verna.

the biggest advantage with verna is its features and less pricing. small kids whose legs dont reaches to clutch cant start the car as u have to start the car by pressing the clutches. u cant accidently put the reverse gear as u have to pull a switch in the gear handle to apply reverse gear. further verna offers 6 airbags in topline along with parking sensor and a camera which is realy helpful. good powerfull 1.6 engine , nice pickup, the car just runs with the word go. adjustable lights and mirrors which are all electronically controlled. AC fitted to the dashboard box inorder to keep ur chocolates and icecream cool. disadvantages with verna are: very hard rear view mirror which is difficult to adjust, no voice or cruise control contrary to ford fiesta, bad rear view and despite the fuidic design ford is better and elegant looking car.

Areas of improvement

exterior, drive qualityprice as far as features and verna is concerned
Rating parameters(out of 5)
4
Exterior/Styles
3
Comfort & Space
4
Performance (Engine/Gear/Overall)
3
Fuel Economy
3
Value for Money/Features
About the Reviewer
Purchase New
Driven forDid a short drive once
Read More
Was this review helpful?
0
0

Back
1
Next