Datsun GO [2014-2018] User Reviews

This is the best among car in 4.3 lakhs...in 2014...i had few other options like kwid,alto 800,eon etc...but datsun goa is thr biggest car in that budget. It has lots of space inside.has lots more space in boot..it is 1.2 litres engine...the showroom guys are very friendly...and do the work properly..it has a small digital meter..and also they give nice offers...and the best thing...its AC cools very fast..??

Exterior Excellent.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) Good comfort & space ( both seating & boot space), Digital clock missing, rear Viper & Defogger missing even in top model, Accessories hard to find in market ( only available at showroom / service center).

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox  Smooth drive quality but less Fuel economy in city drive (13 kmpl).

Ride Quality & Handling Good ride quality, easy handling.

Final Words Definitely go for it if you are not mileage concious. Value for money in comfort, space, ride quality, handling, looks, interior. The exterior look is better than the old-styled Alto family.

• Looks like a no-nonsense built to cost hatch.
• Design. The front looks nice.
• Chrome Datsun sign on steering & front grill.
• The front bench(?) seat can seat 1 hefty built person comfortably.
• Neat boot space.
• Gear lever placement similar to i10
• Gear markings on the speedo.

Areas of improvement Mileage, outer noise in-cabin, power window in A-EPS model. CNG version awaited, rear-view mirror without anti-glare, ORVM should be inside controlled, please change the door handles (tight to open & should be body coloured instead of black), manually operated door mirrors. Basic rear view mirror - no night setting.Open glove compartment.

Interior, exterior looks, Smooth gear shift , drive quality, power steering , Comfort , Boot spaceOuter noise in-cabin, Fuel economy ( in-city ), tight door handles, Accessories un-availability

Simple one word, even this car is not comparing with 10 years old lower version cars from other companies like Maruthi & Hyundai. This is the worst car and never come in the feature. 1. Horrible to drive in traffic 2. No pickup (even Tata Nano is better then this) 3. Poor quality of car body (full noise, we need to cover with audio sound, if you can put bit high volume doors are vibrate) 4. There is a only one back light on revers gear (cost-cutting) Thanks, P V Pratap. 99***4**4.

NANA

Exterior Looking super.

Interior (Features, Space & Comfort) space, seatings are comfortable, Good comfort & space ( both seating & boot space), Digital clock missing, rear Viper & Defogger missing even in top model, Accessories hard to find in market ( only available at showroom / service center).

Engine Performance, Fuel Economy and Gearbox fuel economy very poor, engine perfomance is good, very good breaking system.

Ride Quality & Handling It is fine.

Final Words Good car with poor millage for this cost (Definitely go for it if you are not mileage concious. Value for money in comfort, space, ride quality, handling, looks, interior. The exterior look is better than the old-styled Alto family).

Areas of improvement Improve the seat quality(foam) especially for rear seats, not enough lighting(head light) and cabin light, center lock, tash board locking

Wheel covers(the basic model cars also have wheel covers) Mileage, outer noise in-cabin, power window in A-EPS model. CNG version awaited, rear-view mirror without anti-glare, ORVM should be inside controlled.

Poor fuel economy (most expensive)SHOULD NOT CONTAIN BASIC ACCESSORIES LIKE DIGITAL CLOCK,REAR WIPPER Etc.,