CarWale
Doodle Image-1Doodle Image-2Doodle Image-3
    AD

    Maruti Suzuki Ritz vs Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]

    CarWale brings you comparison of Maruti Suzuki Ritz and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]. The Maruti Suzuki Ritz price is Rs. 4.51 Lakh and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] price is Rs. 3.48 Lakh. The Maruti Suzuki Ritz is available in 1197 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] is available in 1108 cc engine with 1 fuel type options: Petrol. Ritz provides the mileage of 18.5 kmpl and Palio Stile [2007-2011] provides the mileage of 12.4 kmpl.

    Ritz vs Palio Stile [2007-2011] Comparison Overview

    Key HighlightsRitz Palio Stile [2007-2011]
    PriceRs. 4.51 LakhRs. 3.48 Lakh
    Engine Capacity1197 cc1108 cc
    Power85 bhp-
    TransmissionManualManual
    Fuel TypePetrolPetrol
    Maruti Suzuki Ritz
    Rs. 4.51 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]
    Rs. 3.48 Lakh
    Last Recorded Price
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    VS
    VS
    Select Car
    Select Car
    • SPECIFICATIONS
    • FEATURES
    • BROCHURE
    • COLOURS
    • USER REVIEWS
        • SPECIFICATIONS
        • FEATURES
        • BROCHURE
        • COLOURS
        • USER REVIEWS

            Specifications and Finance

            Finance
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            Loading...
            • Engine & Transmission
              Engine
              1197 cc, 4 Cylinders Inline, 4 Valves/Cylinder, DOHC1108 cc, 4 Cylinders Inline, 2 Valves/Cylinder
              Engine Type
              inline 4 cylinder petrol engine1.1L FIRE
              Fuel Type
              PetrolPetrol
              Max Power (bhp@rpm)
              85 bhp @ 6000 rpm57@5250
              Max Torque (Nm@rpm)
              113 Nm @ 4500 rpm92@2750
              Mileage (ARAI) (kmpl)
              18.5View Mileage Details12.4View Mileage Details
              Drivetrain
              FWDFWD
              Transmission
              Manual - 5 GearsManual - 5 Gears
            • Dimensions & Weight
              Length (mm)
              37753827
              Width (mm)
              16801620
              Height (mm)
              16201440
              Wheelbase (mm)
              23602373
              Ground Clearance (mm)
              170
              Kerb Weight (kg)
              1005
            • Capacity
              Doors (Doors)
              55
              Seating Capacity (Person)
              55
              No of Rows (Rows)
              2
              Bootspace (litres)
              236
              Fuel Tank Capacity (litres)
              4347
            • Suspensions, Brakes, Steering & Tyres
              Front Suspension
              McPherson strut with coil springIndependent Wheel, MacPherson type with lower wishbone anchored to cross member, coil springs and te
              Rear Suspension
              Torsion beam & coil springTorsion axle, coil springs, stabilising bar and telescopic dual effect shock absorbers
              Front Brake Type
              DiscDisc
              Rear Brake Type
              DrumDrum
              Minimum Turning Radius (metres)
              4.75.1
              Steering Type
              Power assisted (Electric)
              Wheels
              Steel Rims
              Spare Wheel
              Steel
              Front Tyres
              165 / 80 R14165 / 80 R13
              Rear Tyres
              165 / 80 R14165 / 80 R13

            Features

            • Locks & Security
              Engine Immobiliser
              Central Locking
              With Key
              Speed Sensing Door Lock
              Child Safety Lock
            • Comfort & Convenience
              Air Conditioner
              Yes (Manual)Yes (Manual)
              Heater
              Anti-glare Mirrors
              Manual - Internal Only
              12V Power Outlets
              1
            • Seats & Upholstery
              Seat Upholstery
              FabricFabric
              Rear Passenger Seat TypeBench
              Interiors
              Dual Tone
              Split Rear Seat
              60:40 split
              Headrests
              Front
            • Storage
              Cup HoldersFront OnlyFront Only
            • Doors, Windows, Mirrors & Wipers
              ORVM Colour
              Black
              Adjustable ORVMs
              Internally Adjustable
              Turn Indicators on ORVMs
              Exterior Door HandlesBlack
              Interior Door HandlesBlack
              Door PocketsFront & Rear
              Bootlid Opener
              Internal
            • Exterior
              Roof-mounted Antenna
              Body-coloured Bumpers
            • Lighting
              HeadlightsHalogen
              Taillights
              Halogen
              Cabin LampsFront
              Headlight Height Adjuster
            • Instrumentation
              Instrument Cluster
              Analogue
              Trip MeterMulti-Function Display
              ClockDigital
              Low Fuel Level Warning
            • Manufacturer Warranty
              Warranty (In Years)
              2
              Warranty (In Kilometres)
              40000

            Colours

            Bakers Chocolate
            Carbon Black
            Silky Silver
            Ozone Blue
            New Granite Grey
            Magnesium Grey
            Superior White
            Furnace Red
            New Breeze Blue
            Mint White
            New Mystique Red

            User Reviews

            Overall Rating

            3.7/5

            18 Ratings

            3.0/5

            1 Rating

            Rating Parameters

            3.9Exterior

            5.0Exterior

            4.1Comfort

            5.0Comfort

            4.0Performance

            3.0Performance

            4.0Fuel Economy

            3.0Fuel Economy

            3.9Value for Money

            4.0Value for Money

            Most Helpful Review

            my first car Ritz LXI

            Hi friends ! after spending around 2-3 months on various options, doing a lot of research on net, having TDs i finally books my RITZ LXI today in Jaipur. My budget was only around four lac and was to decide only between i10 and A-star. my mind was saying to go for i10 and heart was saying to go for a Maruti product which was A-star for me. I loved the looks of A-star. and was impressed with FE of Astar. (My daily driving will be around 25km daily) I took two test drives of A-star and I was satisfied with it but there was concern in my mind regarding space. I have family of 4 me, wife, and two daughters of 10 & 8. My kids were in love with looks of A-star but my wife was not happy of it. She used to say that the look from front seat is not good in A-star because of dashboard. There was concerns in my mind also regarding the space in rear and very negligible boot. I read here on reviews that travelling at rear in A-star is horrible. Regarding i10 i was planning to buy i10 1.2 megna. I like that car in size in compression to A-star but i read a lot of complaints regarding i10 like the Electronic Power Steering of i10 has some problems and ASS of Hyundai is good but very costly. So many of my friends suggested to go for only a Maruti product. Today I went to showroom for booking of A-star VXI but before booking I decided to take a TD again. So I went for TD of A-star with the sales guy and I was satisfied with it. But after TD of A-star I decided to go for a TD of RITZ LXI too. The TD of RITZ changed my decision in minutes. The on road cost of A-star VXI here in Jaipur is 4.11 lac where as cost of RITZ LXI is 4.45 lac. so it was the matter of paying around 35k extra but the difference in product is amazing. I found RITZ more roomy both on front and rear seat. The boot is very large, sufficient for two big suitcases. The driving position is amazing. Gear shift is so smooth. the engine is very efficient. even I could take the car direct in 3rd gear with full AC. The engine is noiseless. when car on red lights u cant not guess the engine is off or on. there is no vibration in in side. and when u drive the car u feel like u r riding the road. It gives feel like a SUV. So it was a matter for me of only 35k extra but the reward was amazing. So i booked RITZ LXI and will take delivery after 3 days. When I came home and told my family that for what I went and what i did they all got surprised but that is my style !!!! The only problem is that Maruti guys are not offering any discount on this car and not even any free accessory. but what can be done !!?? So I will keep u posting the further developments.superb driving experience, efficient engine, speciousrear look, no discounts, not too many standard accessaries in LXI

            Good balance of sturdiness, Fuel economy, Comfortable, and a true 5seater hatch back

            <P>Hi All,</P> <P>I&nbsp;Purchased a Fiat Palio 1.1SL Black from Concorde. Its&nbsp;now correct time to&nbsp;talk on the ownership experience, but would like to put down the selection criteria.</P> <P>Wagon R is a thin metal sheet ok for urban (cross to cross and local area commuting) and is a good replacement for a 3 Wheel autorickshaw. Only thing is it sells at 3.32L for LX despite its huge sales numbers (higher sales gives scope for manufacturer to reduce the margin on individual cars and offer it at lesser price, which maruti is not doing). Xing is a good car except for the backseat comfort and narrow width. Koreans and Japanese people have comfort cause of thier own average people sizes. but still SUMO wrestlers cannot fit in either of these. they still have to go for a SUV. Fuel effy of both these are good, considering, but beware they have 5 seatbelts and can seat 4 people.</P> <P>Fiat Palio- the front axle width is wider than the back axle (very imprnt for cornering at high speeds). most SUV have similar axle width ratios.</P> <P>the body is of same width all along and is clearly wider by 10cms then xing and 15cms (half feet) than Wagon R. both xing and WR have equal axle widths and are squarish treads.</P> <P>Tubeless tyres are in Palio. 165/80 rubber 13inch. </P> <P>My palio, a Corporate lease car, returned roughly15.8 kmpl in its 3000KMS range with 1300kms city/bad road/hilly terrain drive. this is&nbsp;with in most cases, 5 people on board with GVW-990KGS+360KGS.</P> <P>Pick up is clearly slow but observe the 1/4 mile distance is covered in 5seconds&nbsp;delay to that of Xing and Wagon R. Even if for the entire life,&nbsp;we cummulate the 5seconds, we may loose 5 yrs time for 60yrs of driving. But tell me who drives for 60yrs driving time and if so, what would 5yrs matter for him then. </P> <P>If the 3cars are put on race from Bangalore to Delhi (with a perfect straight highway exclusively for the 3), and all the three are on full throttle (that is 150kmph xing, 145kmph wagonR and 131kmph Palio Stile), only then Stile would take a full 3hrs late arrival at Delhi after 15hrs 2200kms continous drive. Thats the maximum difference.&nbsp;We (the palio users never pitch palio for doing this job).&nbsp;We know that our OEM has a much better answer in&nbsp;Ferrari's to do this job. and</P> <P>Suzuki is known to be a very good BIKE manufacturer.</P> <P>But lets remember, the tolerance on Indian roads are 80-100kmph and also, I do remember we frequently have to decelerate and accelerate where the Xing's and WagonR's may win.</P> <P>Most important to remember also is, we do not have a straight track all along. for curves, a Differential width pair of axles (particularly the wide front track) is important (and no tall boy design&nbsp;please). Palio manages to maintain a relatively&nbsp;although may be 10kmph&nbsp;higher speed&nbsp;while cornering.</P> <P>Another important thing is the 80-0kmph braking distance required, which is the lowest for Palio and the other 2 have real problems.</P> <P>A typical indian car customer is lured by the BHP (they also dont see at which RPM is the BHP), and the KMPL (they never bother how much is the seating capacity) althought there can be 5 seat belts on every car. well, if we are actually thinking to have a good FE for 1 person, then better drive a Bajaj Platina? for FE, or if we think we need a reasonable so called societal commute (?) then better those buy a 3 BOX Sedan like SX4?.</P> <P>Among Getz, UVA and Fiat Palio (the comparable 3 cars), The choice is clearly Palio Stile 1.1SL, for some trade off for sure in the pick-up. The power is really pathetically low and is best sutied for sedate driving people. Fiat is just 5cms lesser in width compared to Getz and UVA. Again, please do not take those pick up and BHP figures.</P> <P>The xing's and Wagon R's are better compared with SPARK (all the 3 are 4seaters 1ltr engines).</P>Driveability, steerability at high speeds, comfortable back seatslightly sluggish

            You may also like
            Starting at Rs. 99,000
            Starting at Rs. 60,000

            Ritz comparison with similar cars

            Palio Stile [2007-2011] comparison with similar cars

            Ritz vs Palio Stile [2007-2011] Comparison FAQs

            Q: Which car is cheaper between Maruti Suzuki Ritz and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011]?
            Maruti Suzuki Ritz price is Rs. 4.51 Lakh and Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] price is Rs. 3.48 Lakh. Hence Fiat Palio Stile [2007-2011] is the cheapest amongst these cars.

            Q: Which car between Ritz and Palio Stile [2007-2011] is better in terms of fuel economy?
            For the Lxi BS-IV variant, mileage of Ritz is 18.5kmpl and for the SL 1.1 variant, mileage of Palio Stile [2007-2011] is 12.4kmpl. Thus making Ritz the most fuel efficient as compared to Palio Stile [2007-2011]

            Q: How is the performance of Ritz compared to Palio Stile [2007-2011]?
            For the Lxi BS-IV variant, 1197 cc Petrol engine of Ritz produces 85 bhp @ 6000 rpm of power and 113 Nm @ 4500 rpm of torque. For the SL 1.1 variant, 1108 cc Petrol engine of Palio Stile [2007-2011] produces 57@5250 of power and 92@2750 of torque.
            Disclaimer: For the above Comparison of Compare Ritz and Palio Stile [2007-2011], CarWale has taken utmost care in gathering precise and accurate information about price, specs, features, colours etc, however, CarWale cannot be held liable for any direct or indirect damage/loss. For Compare Ritz and Palio Stile [2007-2011] comparison, we have considered most popular variant on CarWale as default, however, any variant of these cars can be compared.