You are here : Community » Forums » Reviews » A-Star (ZXi) Driven
Today's Posts | Search Forums

A-Star (ZXi) Driven

#21 21-Nov, 2008 06:43 PM
DeviLz
City: Mangalore
Legend




Brief Review oF ACI who has drioven the A star!!

 

 
Glance at the A-Star and what’s immediately obvious is the departure from the existing Alto’s basic boxy shape. This car oozes style and attitude. Much more than just a box with a nose, the A-Star’s profile is fundamentally different from the Alto’s and the details are bold and confident. There’s no traditional grille. The inlet to the radiator is placed really low down and the headlights are mounted really high up. And then the turning lights pop out like machine gun pods.  The basic shape harks of its Swift sibling; a compact cabin area with wide haunches. The sole reminder of the Alto are the taillights, possibly a concession to the car’s identity. The A-Star looks spunky and fresh but what about its driving manners? Time to have a go.
 
 

Like the exterior, the cabin is a step forward too for a small Maruti. The driver’s seat is really quite comfortable, there’s no seat height adjustment or adjustable steering sadly, but there is plenty of travel on the front seats. You can really slide the seat back and stretch your legs out and that’s a refreshing change. There’s a lot of the Swift in the interior, things like the steering wheel, gear lever and knobs and buttons but more on that later.

 
 

On firing up the motor, there is a hint of shudder and vibration at idle and though it’s not obtrusive or jarring like a diesel, it’s something you would rather not have. This slight roughness is down to the fact that the motor is a three-cylinder unit, and it is the three’s natural vibrations that are difficult to get rid of. And that’s despite the fact that this is a brand-new all-aluminum, twin-cam motor. However, tap the throttle and the mild rocking or vibration disappears immediately. The motor is now honey smooth and hugely responsive, even just off idle; this means the A-Star feels alert and ready to skip forward. You can short-shift and the motor will still yank you forward in traffic, even with just an inch of throttle travel. It feels as or more responsive than even a Santro and that’s pretty unreal.



~LiKe.No.oTheR~

Total Posts: 2992
#22 21-Nov, 2008 06:44 PM
DeviLz
City: Mangalore
Legend




COntinued-

The steering is light and pretty direct, the brakes are well weighted and work well, and the gearbox is actually better than that on the Swift. It’s somewhat lighter to use and doesn’t baulk like the Swift’s unit.

 

With its stiff new chassis, Swift- like front suspension and tall springs, this new Maruti small car rips ups yet another well earned Maruti stereotype. Light footed through rough patches, well composed over even large bumps and giving an impression that it has been robustly engineered, the A-Star skips very happily over the broken stretches of tarmac. There is an underlying layer of stiffness for sure and you do feel some bumps at times, but this also means body control over bumps is very good.

 

According to the company, the rear seats in this car segment are used very rarely in and as a result space and comfort is only just about enough in the new car. Headroom is tight, the rear seat is narrow and then the back rest short. The high sides of the car and the large headrests up front also make the rear seat pretty claustrophobic. However, underthigh support isn’t too bad. What is horrendously insufficient is the boot. Barely large enough for a  couple of soft bags, this boot doesn't hold much even if you fold the rear seat. The A-Star is well specified on the safety front with two airbags and ABS.

 

Bottom line

 
Ideally suited to urban conditions, with its very responsive engine, slick gearbox and light steering, the A-Star is anything but a chore to drive in town. It covers ground rapidly with minimum effort, it looks funky, the front seats are comfortable and it is well specified too. Added to all this is the fact that Maruti claims this is its new fuel efficiency champion, not something to be taken lightly. Okay it isn’t perfect with its cramped rear seats and some iffy interior plastic. But there’s no doubting the A-Star is very good where it matters. Priced competitively, the A-Star should be the next big small car.

Source- AUTOCARINDIA

Cheers,
Sri




~LiKe.No.oTheR~
Total Posts: 2992
#23 21-Nov, 2008 06:45 PM
DeviLz
City: Mangalore
Legend




Will get the Car to my place soon and take snaps of it and will post them here soon! till then....

Cheers,
Sri



~LiKe.No.oTheR~
Total Posts: 2992
#24 21-Nov, 2008 06:59 PM
Pankaj Prasad
City: Bhavnagar




Posted by Sri
Headroom is tight, the rear seat is narrow and then the back rest short. The high sides of the car and the large headrests up front also make the rear seat pretty claustrophobic. However, underthigh support isn’t too bad. What is horrendously insufficient is the boot.

 

 ....the front seats are comfortable and it is well specified too.

 

I think that seconds my observation mentioned before.  This is despite 1600mm width - more than the others (post #10) - due to improper space management & design, I suppose.

 

Regarding front seats... well my friend (5.7) & I did not find it comfortable.

 

In any case, as stated before, I will be taking a 'test-drive' (real sense) in a 3/4 days & will update my observations afresh.



Total Posts: 5905
#25 22-Nov, 2008 12:33 AM
Backbencher
Driven




well .. i have had a test drive of the A Star and was pretty satisfied( apart from the headroom of the car!)
i seriously donot know what one does expect from a small car!! this car, as i stated, is "THE CAR" that maruti has launched..right from state of the art interior to the best engine.. not to mention the "K Series engine is the "same type" of engine as in i10 kappa, which instead is priced over 4.3L... one major difference is that in the A Star Vxi, there are both front and rear power windows, whereas in the i10 era(priced 20k more than A Star Vxi), there are only front power windows..so one gets the same engine "type", with a much better feel and OF COUSE THE "MARUTI" FACTOR...!! i guess its a great deal for 3.9L on road... and that too with wheel covers, stereo+2 speakers...
WHAT MORE DO YOU EXPECT FROM A A2 segment car guys!!??? if one does want more, then pay30-40k more and pick up the i10, and that too with more maintenance costs on every servicing....!!


Total Posts: 36
Last Updated: 22-Nov, 2008 12:40 AM, by Backbencher
#26 22-Nov, 2008 05:46 AM
Binoy Thomas
City: Trivandrum




The engines in the i10 and the A-star cannot be compared. One is a 3 cylinder while the other is a 4 cylinder and there is significant power difference.

By your logic the Spark is the best small to buy-why spend 50K more than the A-star!

Have a look at this


Total Posts: 2944
#27 22-Nov, 2008 08:21 AM
Pankaj Prasad
City: Bhavnagar




@Backbencher, none of us are 'advocating' against A-Star. We are discussing the findings/observations of A-Star & it is very natural that it would be compared with a few others - especially because there are many who waited for its launch before finalising on a car.  If A-Star suits someone's requirements (space/comfort included), preferences & budget, he should go for it - no harm in it.

Total Posts: 5905
#28 22-Nov, 2008 09:02 AM
Backbencher
Driven




@ Mr. Binoy thomas.
yeah.. there is no harm in going for the Spark... Apart from the fact that GM might not see 2009 and the after sales are REALLY BAD... AND the car might not have a resale vaule as compared to its cost...
and i was comparing the "engine type"... the A Star and the i10 kappa have similar "types" by significant reduction in the engine weight, thereby better efficiency for the power so given by the car...They have been made by altogether a different platform, so cannot be compared to the spark as the spark has the engine of the past...!!

@ Mr. pankaj...
U r absolutely right... i was just pointing on to the positives... was not imposing...No offence..!!

btw, have a look at this review   http://zigwheels.com/cars_in_india/First_Drive:_Maruti_Suzuki_A_Star--First11_20081118--/INDT/Reviews/First11_20081118--1--2


Total Posts: 36
Last Updated: 22-Nov, 2008 09:13 AM, by Backbencher
#29 22-Nov, 2008 10:03 AM
Binoy Thomas
City: Trivandrum




Posted by Backbencher
@ Mr. Binoy thomas.
the A Star and the i10 kappa have similar "types" by significant reduction in the engine weight, thereby better efficiency for the power so given by the car...


please enlighten us on this particular 'type' of engines-any other engines from any other manufactures?

-both are internal combustion petrol engines-and there the similarities end!

About the Spark am not advocating the same-but just threw in an example to highlight the fallacies of such a logic as what you have put forward!


Total Posts: 2944
Last Updated: 22-Nov, 2008 10:04 AM, by Binoy Thomas
#30 22-Nov, 2008 10:04 AM
Pankaj Prasad
City: Bhavnagar




@Backbencher, thanks for the link. Nice review.

 

What I have been emphasing is - not withstanding the features, power etc. - despite the positives reported, it is low on comfort/space- due to improper space management & the design (as stated before). It's, therefore, not comparable with others under reference - unless, the given space/comfort suits the buyer.

 

Regarding the engine, like Binoy has stated, it cannot be compared with others under reference, as A-Star has 3 cylinders with 4 values each (12 values) while the others under reference have 4 cylinders with  4 values each (16 values) - Spark has 2 values each (8 valves).  But again, Spark has better space/comfort than A-Star (& is a VFM) - take a test drive.



Total Posts: 5905
Last Updated: 22-Nov, 2008 10:23 AM, by Pankaj Prasad