Part 2
Subsequently, Skoda dealer, JMD Auto called me for a compromise.
A meeting was fixed where I met Mr. Ashutosh Dixit, GM Sales, Skoda.
Mr. Dixit sounded sincere and made all the right noises.
He agreed to release my car in return for striking out Skoda from the Consumer Case and to refrain from speaking to the media.
He assured to take action against Nummer Eins within 45 days.
However he tried to pull a fast one on me. He too, tried to make me endorse that their dealer did not put these parts.
I refused and the stalemate continued.
Despite confirmation of fraud committed by their dealer and despite many skeletons in their closet,
I agreed to let Skoda off the hook.
I did not ask for a new car.
I did not ask for compensation.
I did not ask him to accept that Skoda dealer, Nummer Eins had installed the spurious parts. Why should I then accept that their dealer did not do it?
To Skoda’s credit they terminated the dealership of Nummer Eins on 5th September 2008. On 17th September 2008, in an interim ruling, the Honourable District Forum, ruled that Skoda bear the cost of repairs and hand over my car fully restored as per international standards.
Skoda appealed against this order to the Honourable State forum and obtained a stay.
Here is my question – Skoda, have confirmed this fraud committed by their dealer. They have even terminated this dealership.
Why would then Skoda want to fight with me, deprive me of the use of my car?
Is it to satiate a bruised ego?