You are here : Research » User Written Reviews » Chevrolet Spark » Chevrolet Spark Reviews

WE LOVE YOU MATIZ, BUT NOT SPARK OF COURSE

A Review by Mishra on Chevrolet Spark
11 May, 2007 (Last Updated: 11 February, 2008)
Average User Rating :
  88 reviews | Write a review
 User's Ratings for the car

Style
Comfort
Performance
Value for Money
Fuel Economy
 
Overall
Cons : Less spacious and ugly styling..GM has killed matis..High pricing...
Review Popularity

Total Views 12305
People Liked 613
People Disliked 71
GM has proved it once again how to kill the beauty and style of a car... they just finished a world class marvel, matiz.. they made that beauty queen a muscular lady by adopting ugly european style...
matiz..we lost you forever..
spark simply SUCKS!!



Was this review helpful to you ? Yes | No

95 Comment(s) on this Review

  1. on 13 May, 2007 at 07:18 PM Arunvkhare

    hi,

    I am planning to buy a car in this segment. for single handed, city use. going through the details of Spark 1.0 LS, Fiat Palio Stile 1.1. slx, Santro Xing XO eRLX- Euro III. Prefer to buy Spark, needs advise.
    Thank You,
    Arun

  2. on 12 Jul, 2007 at 11:52 PM Prashant Mohan (Nagpur)

    Go ahead. Its a good car.

  3. on 17 Jul, 2007 at 05:56 PM Shameer Cp

    The absence of front grills was the only problem with matiz. The makers of spark can't solve this. The price is some higher. I think it is better to get the standard edition at 2.75 lakhs.

  4. on 10 Aug, 2007 at 06:09 PM Jijeesh Lj (Hyderabad)

    its worth to take LS.

  5. on 22 Aug, 2007 at 03:59 PM Santosh Chandrasekaran

    I test drove a SPARK LS in Chennai. There seems to be a feature with the accelerator pedal and produces unexpected fluttering trying to push against the foot of the driver. Happened on both the demo cars at the showroom. Me, my cousin and my brother-in-law who works as a car company QA engineer, all felt the problem with SPARK LS and LT. Anyone else felt this during your test drive?

  6. on 28 Aug, 2007 at 06:48 PM Novice

    I think in exterior looks no other car on date is capable of competing with Spark, not even the old Matiz. You can juxtapose them and compare. I have done it and spark stands apart. On road, people can't stop saying "Wow! what a car". I think in comparison, santro, zen, alto, wagon R, all have boxy look and certinaly doesn't have that oomph factor that SPARK has. If you drop Spark because of its looks and style, then I think you don't have the taste of a stylish car. Go for it!

  7. on 21 Sep, 2007 at 06:09 PM Novice

    Hey Santosh, I think I used to feel the kind of fluttering that you are talking about initially in the first few weeks of my buying Spark. But now everything seems fine. In fact I never thought that was a problem. It appeared that that kind of thing was happening whenever I released the accelerator pedal with a jerk. anyways, that kind of thing I don't see any more.

  8. on 21 Sep, 2007 at 06:14 PM Novice

    I am really surprised that 171 people have liked this review. It compares Matiz with Spark and that too without facts and figures. If at all you are doing a comparision, please do it with the cars that are currently available to the customers. So what if Matiz was a better car than Spark. Does it mean that I should buy a Santro or a Zen? Makes me wonder if people like a review just for the heck of it or they just want to demote SPARK?

  9. on 16 Oct, 2007 at 12:39 AM Tluckhegde

    i am plannin to buy a SPARk.. n just wanted a comparision with other cars in this segment.. but all the comment placee above seems to be useless

  10. on 18 Oct, 2007 at 10:00 AM Saroj Mahapatra (Jamshedpur)

    To some extent you are right, the shape has become more squarish.

  11. on 18 Oct, 2007 at 09:32 PM Iceman_Ss

    What a dumb review man! Looks are totally subjective
    and i think the spark is deft. better lookin than matiz. And what "ugly european styling" r u talking about. Do u even have the faintest idea about automobile design and the sheer number of parameters goin into it. The new car is a lot better in safety and fit n finish.

  12. on 18 Oct, 2007 at 09:51 PM Mishra

    no! no! no! not at all..The Europeans are trying forcefully to implement their aesthetic ideas on the third world..I would say matiz is the best and spark really sucks..!! The fit and finish might have improved; but still..the overall aesthetic appeal has come down drastically..Its true that beauty lies in the eyes of the spectators ; so leave the idea..but still i would stick on to my comment...see the perfection of Matiz and ugly muscles of Spark..even the very name...poor GM they have lost i

  13. on 18 Oct, 2007 at 09:57 PM Mishra

    The Mtech engine was much more superior when technical specifications are concerned; in Spark they have adopted another engine..its smooth even when he drive the car at 90 or 100 kms per hour. But it lacks additional valves and I would say wagon R's engine is much more superior. Style wise Spark simply lacks..Its a Muscular Lady...GM sucks US sucks

  14. on 18 Oct, 2007 at 10:00 PM Mishra

    A car should have perfection.; it is the diseased European and US minds producing such ugly creatures like Spark...Even the very name Matiz had a poetry in it..GM losers!!

  15. on 20 Oct, 2007 at 08:08 AM Kamlesh Gujaria (Mumbai)

    No Other car in this segement can compete style, performance and fuel economy in this segement compared to Spark. Ugly looking Wagon R and Santro can not at all be considered as Vehicels. This is not for somebody who does not understnad beauty, it requires brains and test of designe. I've been driving spark since 2 months. Initially wanted to go for Swift Dand Changed to Spark. Excellent Suspension in City like Mumbai. Bumper to Bumper driving has been made easy with Spark. Fly with it dont rid

  16. on 20 Oct, 2007 at 08:10 AM Kamlesh Gujaria (Mumbai)

    No Other car in this segement can compete style, performance and fuel economy in this segement compared to Spark. Ugly looking Wagon R and Santro can not at all be considered as Vehicels. This is not for somebody who does not understnad beauty, it requires brains and test of designe. I've been driving spark since 2 months. Initially wanted to go for Swift Dand Changed to Spark. Excellent Suspension in City like Mumbai. Bumper to Bumper driving has been made easy with Spark. Fly with it dont rid

  17. on 22 Oct, 2007 at 12:09 PM Mishra

    "This is not for somebody who does not understand beauty, it requires brains" Here lies the truth, to appreciate beauty one needs a heart; and of course not brain, only the briny babies would appreciate the muscular lady Spark. It is pretty than all other Bourvita Babies like santro wagon r etc in style. But what i am saying is it lost the greatness of Matiz in style, GM has disappointed us all. It has got good comfort and fuel efficiency ...i do agree. Go ahead with your spark and fly.gud luc

  18. on 31 Oct, 2007 at 03:23 PM Vikas Jadhav (Pune)

    i am planing to buy a car i want to know from Spark and Zen user, for which car i have to go for.....

  19. on 01 Nov, 2007 at 11:18 AM Mishra

    Do u mean Zen Estilo?? Its safety standards are not up to the mark, you cant drive this car at high speeds and will feel vibration at 85-90; but spark is much more superior and can comfortably drive at 90 km/h. Spark promises you the same millage and when it comes to comfort, spark simply rockzz.. Finally about style you have to decide as its purely personal choice. I dont have much information about space..

  20. on 10 Nov, 2007 at 03:29 PM Chaitu

    1 thing readers shud not miss think here is tht may be matiz was better lookin than spark but it does nt mean tht its worse than santro or estilo.. no dout tht spark is better than all other in this segment even da history car matiz.. now only i10 can be comapred in terms of style.. both r 1 hell of cuties.

  21. on 11 Nov, 2007 at 11:45 PM Haim Chat (Mumbai)

    i'm thinking about going for spark, but there r so many negative pts to it. is the car too small for 5.
    had seen it n wanted to go for it , now i'm re thinking. is santro better in this range. wats the opinion

  22. on 12 Nov, 2007 at 01:41 AM Chaitu

    evry car got -ve pnts. any car in dis segment like santro estilo wagonr or spark is not comfrtable for 3 in da rear seat.[i10 compartively better. it is wider]spark is better in looks smooth engine tubeles tyres gas suspension n beter fuel eff dan santro. santro better pickup n comfrtble 4 tall people in rear seat[taller at back side] but closing model but cheaper dan spark. i tuk spark last week. if only thes 2 cars ur options den go 4 spark or i10. strictly for 5 den swift or getz or aveo uv

  23. on 22 Nov, 2007 at 11:19 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    i am totally agree with chaiu, spark is better in this segment. very smooth engine and class suspension. looks.... atleast i like it. well i10 definitely better interiors but what u think about fuel efficiency? santro is giving around 12 in city what you think i10 will give you? less than santro i guess coz engine is same santro engine, bhp increased, car is heavy than santro... avg. will be less than santro. I could go for i10 cuz interiors are too good but i picked spark coz its better.

  24. on 22 Nov, 2007 at 11:28 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    and also i want to add one thing abut reviews here. anyone can rate his review higher here. this is a serious problem. just clicked on this review is helpful for me .. yes .. clicked yes n no. of people lked increasing. anyone can refresh the page and rate his review higher. as i am a spark user now, i think this review is totally worthless. Looks does matters and look of spark is too good far better than wagon-r, zen estilo and Santro (Its too old now).

  25. on 29 Nov, 2007 at 05:17 PM Chaitu

    what a dumb review... completely baseless.. hes saying like i hate mango becos sugar is sweeter....
    meaningless is nt it??

  26. on 30 Nov, 2007 at 10:37 PM Mishra

    spark is superior as far as suspension, fit and finish, comfort are concerned...but is simply lacks looks..Its simply a muscular lady..Its too small for 5 people..so it cant be compared with i10 or even estillo or santro...Stupid designers make ugly monsters...I pity you spark. If someone purchased spark, they are bound to describe the plus points only... Let me clear it once again, spark is a great car for 2 people, but it is an ugly creation when compared to Matiz...Korea wins the westernmind

  27. on 03 Dec, 2007 at 12:23 AM Chaitu

    i seriously contradict ur all points specially this point of urs ''If someone purchased spark, they are bound to describe the plus points only.'' no1 will buy a car just like that.. becos we saw and analysed those plus points then we bought it. before buying it, it was nt our car. anyway for good or bad anythin out of 100, 1 wil b odd. it depends on indivisuality. if not compared to any other car spark is great car for 4.if comapred then only i10 is tuf competetor excluding service network

  28. on 03 Dec, 2007 at 12:28 AM Chaitu

    i seriously contradict ur all points specially this point of urs ''If someone purchased spark, they are bound to describe the plus points only.'' no1 will buy a car just like that.. becos we saw and analysed those plus points then we bought it. before buying it, it was nt our car. anyway for good or bad anythin out of 100, 1 wil b odd. it depends on indivisuality. if not compared to any other car spark is great car for 4.if comapred then only i10 is tuf competetor excluding service network

  29. on 03 Dec, 2007 at 12:32 AM Chaitu

    and by the way wat is this korean attraction of urs... u r saying hyundai is good cos its korean... u liked matiz cos daewoo was korean... so only korean cars r good but not others..!!

  30. on 08 Dec, 2007 at 09:30 PM Binduraj

    interior plastics cheap,but great in design and suspension.4 person car.

  31. on 10 Dec, 2007 at 10:56 PM Pritam (Pune)

    I am evaluating small cars at the moment. i test drove spark, santro, Wagon R, Estilo and Indica petrol. Without thinking Estilo looks odd, driving is crab. Indica petrol xeta is great pleasure and power but maintainance and milage - TATA need to go one step more.
    Santro is outdated - they should close it with i10 on road.
    Wagon R and Spark are great driving pleasure, cost is appropriate as well. i10 need to be cheaper by 50,000... what about resale value? Wagon R scores here i think..views??

  32. on 18 Jan, 2008 at 10:19 PM Swapan

    I booked a spark the base model and after three months of waiting and extremely poor response of the staff of the showroom (Regent) and the company officials i finally paid more to upgrade to PS model as i was constantly told the base model will get delayed. The Manager of GM told me that since he has so many clients complaining about late deliveries he cannot always remember my case. Very bad experience!!!

  33. on 25 Jan, 2008 at 10:27 PM Udaya

    I want to know Whether Matiz car will have the same spare Parts of Spark so that Matiz owners will be gained to keep the vehicle happily instead of frustration

  34. on 25 Jan, 2008 at 10:29 PM Udaya

    I want to know Whether Matiz car will have the same spare Parts of Spark so that Matiz owners will be gained to keep the vehicle happily instead of frustration

  35. on 26 Jan, 2008 at 03:06 PM Mishra

    Spark is created in an entirely different platform and almost all components are different from Matiz. But GM has promised their service support for Matiz. so you may get the spares from GM showroom. But across India people are complaining of the poor service support of GM.

    Can anyone tell me why Stupid US and UK companies dont introduce their latest models in India? The answer is simple and they still think that India is a country of barbarians. Japanese companies are still better.

  36. on 26 Jan, 2008 at 03:10 PM Mishra

    Why I am supporting Korean Technology? Still there is a point. Korea has won the world's heart. They give us technically more superior products with more features than their nearest Japanese competitors. LG, Samsung, Hundai...

    What I am trying to say is Spark is a good car in all other aspects except it looks. Matiz is far more superior in style; but may be not in fit and finish coz the car has come to our market many years ago. US companies just lack the aesthetic sense.

  37. on 26 Jan, 2008 at 03:12 PM Mishra

    they simply brainwash people all over the world by saying the plus points of European styling. Its simply rubbish and still i would like to stick to the point that SPARK IS A MASCULINE LADY!!!

  38. on 29 Jan, 2008 at 04:42 PM Prashant

    i bought spark in the month of Oct06. it is a very comfortable car as compaired to santro and wagon-R. it is wider than wagon-R and Estilo. In city i get average of 12-13 without 1st service. on 26 i went to mathura n Agra with my family.drive was very smooth n i got an average of 17-18kmpl and thats wothout any servicing. after 1st service average will go up. guys go for spark. it looks small from out and very spacious from inside. i am 5.11 and can sit very comfrotabily inside. thumps-up 4 GM

  39. on 01 Feb, 2008 at 12:36 PM Nipun Bharti

    aesthetics are a personal choice but i feel there is something wrong in spark looks.it is neither male looking nor female looking,therefore it is the in between thing looks wise

  40. on 11 Feb, 2008 at 01:08 PM Mishra

    haha you are right Nipun..it is neither male nor female..its a Shikhandi... and dear Prashanth..if an elder person sits on the back seat..he will have rheumatoid arthritis..small car and a big price..GM might be thinking that they can cheat Indians...This car should cost around only 2.7 lacks..such tiny muscular lady

  41. on 18 Feb, 2008 at 02:00 PM Res2

    I have matiz. can anybody tell me from where i can get parts for matiz
    my email is res2@rediffmail.com

  42. on 19 Feb, 2008 at 04:16 PM Mishra

    GM is providing service for Matiz; but i am not sure about the spares. You take your matiz to the nearest GM service, they may be able to help u

  43. on 27 Feb, 2008 at 02:04 PM Kateee_Lim

    i love my spark.. i love it very much! I save on gas.. it's easy to park, smooth driving.. i absolutely love it!

  44. on 04 Mar, 2008 at 12:13 PM Nipun Bharti

    If you see Topgear web site,the most respected in Europe,Spark is A CHEAP AND CHEAP LOOKING car.This clearly indicates which segments of customers are buying it in Europe.Unfortunately in India this car is slotted as a premium hatch by over pricing despite it actually being a cheap and cheap looking car as given in Topgear web site

  45. on 11 Mar, 2008 at 03:21 PM Prateek

    HEY SANTOSH...
    there is a technical reason for wat u observed..when we press the accelerator more fuel is injected n if u do that with clutch pedal pressed there is wastage of fuel hence low mileage...it is deliberately done by the company..
    NIPUN talk of indian buyers.ny european..european cars hv diff standrds which indian cars do nt match..people here are loving spark n there is a reason 4 it as it is the best in its segment in evry point of view...

  46. on 12 Mar, 2008 at 01:16 PM Osram

    Just because some people are left with no argument they start abusing others.

  47. on 25 Mar, 2008 at 11:51 AM Nipun Bharti

    HEY PRATEEK,READ THE REVIEW ON TOPGEAR ,IT IS HILARIOUS,YOU WILL LAUGH.MY POINT ABOUT SPARK IS ONLY THIS THAT A CHEAP AND CHEAP LOOKING CAR BECOMES A PREMIUM SMALL CAR IN INDIA WHEN AT BEST IT SHOULD BE PITTED AGAINST ALTO ,OMNI AND THE LIKE

  48. on 13 Apr, 2008 at 05:38 PM Sunil John (Navi Mumbai)

    i want to by a Chevy spark LS model. can any one suggest is it better to buy a Spark or an Alto? I have no idea. What about both of theirs spares as well as resale values?? Would love to receive comments and guidence. Sunil John, Mumbai

  49. on 16 Apr, 2008 at 03:06 AM Krishnanshivakumar.Kumar

    HI everyone,

    Iam planning for a car and just trying to compare with alto,santro and spark,
    For me the outer looks does n't matter and iam concerned of the driving comfort,the back seat comfort,cost of the car and ofcourse the safety.
    can i get some good suggestions

  50. on 09 May, 2008 at 01:46 PM Gurkanwal Singh

    Santro has best rear seat comfort and driving comfort also.Cost wise,Alto is the best in running and purchase cost.

  51. on 09 May, 2008 at 02:01 PM Mishra

    There is a wide difference in choosing a car in India when compared to Europe and US. In Europe and US they buy a car only after closely examining the technical specification and drive. But unfortunately in India people are after passions. If Sharuk Khan asks them to buy a car they would definitely buy it. My only concern is you buy the most advanced technology car after driving it. You also look for service and the credibility of the company. Just dont go after company names; as many....

  52. on 09 May, 2008 at 02:06 PM Mishra

    companies are cheating us. For example When ford came to India the first time they have introduced a model which was using 15 years back technology in US. Same is true with Toyota. They think that India is not capable enough to adopt new technology.

    Second thing, we Indians had a beautiful aesthetic sense. Our vehicles were of great shape. But now European styling is imposed upon us. Some muscles and bulges here and there. They are all ugly. (anyway its a personal view point)

  53. on 09 May, 2008 at 02:08 PM Mishra

    See the case of Honda cars. How comfortable and technically superior they are; but see the shape...

    Koreans are even far better. They have more features in every products, right from nail cutters to cars. India can design marvelous cars and we can even compete to Italy for this matter

  54. on 09 May, 2008 at 02:12 PM Mishra

    Matiz was the car which I loved most by its shape. Spark is the one which is most comfortable and easy to drive and when it comes to shape it is terribly disappointing.. Even there was a magic in the name Matiz..Spark is a trans gender and it is priced high. GM is not an Indian friendly company and they produce ugly monsters like aveo etc.. These types of aesthetic sense comes only from an American diseased mind.

    Last but not the least.. Alto and Spark are beyond comparison and Spark

  55. on 09 May, 2008 at 02:13 PM Mishra

    spark is far ahead in every aspect... like technology, comfort, driving and handling, and even shape..

  56. on 23 May, 2008 at 03:41 PM Manoj

    I own spark for 6 months. The car looks small from front,sides, but big from back and more spacious inside than Alto. VeryVeryVery good suspension.You can drive @25 Km/Hr in 5th Gear. Mileage I am getting in NON-highways is 13 with AC. Very stable in 100 Km/hr. I drove at 110 km/hr sped maximum

  57. on 23 May, 2008 at 04:40 PM Manoj

    Somebody in this forum compaints that spark is cheap in foregin markets. Pl. check this link http://www.sgcarmart.com/main/listing.php?MOD=Chevrolet%20Spark
    Spark is the most beautiful and cute car available in Indian market in its segment and also cost wise attractive these days as this 1000 cc comfortable car with more features than Alto cost only that much with 3 year warranty and cashless ownership. Now it is best time to purchase a spark. But mileage is less than Alto

  58. on 28 May, 2008 at 06:21 PM Nipun Bharti

    Spark is smaller than cars like Santro and is size wise same as Alto.

  59. on 11 Jul, 2008 at 10:53 AM Kamal Dhingra (New Delhi)

    I want to buy a small car my choices are Spark, Alto, Wagon R please suggest me a car my mail id is Dhingra.kamal@gmail.com

  60. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 02:41 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    I dont know why Nipun always Compare Spark with Alto only, Sizewise its similar to estilo den why Crampy Little Alto..lolz

    Users r satisfied but Critics.. lolz

    Its damn good car in small segment and with new pricing..... THE BEST SMALL CAR IN INDIAN MARKET!

  61. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 02:45 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    There is nothing in this review and its about LOOKS ONLY, WHICH IN MY OPINION IS "VERY PERSONAL MATTER", STILL 521 PEOPLE LIKED THIS REVIEW? STRANGE... VERY STRANGE, THIS IS A USER REVIEW? NO!! ITS ABOUT LOOKS OF SPARK N WAT IF I WROTE THE SPARK IS CUTEST CAR ON INDIAN ROADS? EVERYONE WILL SAY ITS REALLY VERY HELPFUL? USER REVIEW OR A TEST DRIVE... COMPARE FEATURES N TELL PROS. N CONS. THATS WAT I THINK. SPARK IS A NICE CAR GUYS!! BETTER DEN FEW CARS OF ITS SEGMENT!

  62. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 02:51 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    I AM USING AND MILEAGE I AM GETTING ALMOST 14 KMPL WITH 100% A.C. WAT ELSE I SHOULD EXPECT? 80% USER NEVER CHECKED WAT MILEAGE THEIR CAR IS GIVING AND THE CRITERIA SHOULD BE ONE TANK FULL TO ANOTHER TANKFULL AND DISTANCE COVERED. SOMEHOW I CAME TO THIS PAGE AND I WILL STRONGLY SAY THAT IF SOMEONE IS SAYING SPARK IS LESS COMFORTABLE AS COMPARE TO SANTRO DEN I MUST SAY WOH KABHI SPARK MAY BAITHA HE NAHI HAI. ITS VERY COMFORTABLE CAR, SIT N FEEL THE DIFFERENCE!!!!!

  63. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 02:56 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    AS A USER... I BOUGHT IT @3.74 LAC ON ROAD, N ITS CHEAPER NOW BUT STILL I FEEL MY DECISION WAS TOO GOOD, THE CAR IS TOO GOOD AND I AM FEELING ITS MORE COMFORTABLE THEN THE CARS I USED EARLIAR WAGON-R & SANTRO.

    RESALE: THE PERFORMANCE OF THE CAR IS VERY GOOD AND IF THE PERFORMANCE IS GOOD, MAINTENANCE IS LOW AND MILEAGE IS HIGH... RESALE WOULD BE BETTER.. INFACT THE BEST!! ANYONE IS THINKING ABOUT SMALL CAR? TAKE A TEST RIDE N DEN SIT AT REAR SEAT AND FEEL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SPARK N OTHER

  64. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 03:00 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    Length (mm): Spark 3495, santro 3565, estilo 3495,
    Width (mm): Spark 1495, santro 1525, estilo 1495,
    Mileage overall: Spark 14.7, santro 12.7, estilo 13.3,
    Cc: Spark 995, Santro 1086, Estilo 1061
    Power (PS@RPM): Spark 63@5400, Santro 63@5500, Estilo 64@6200,
    Max. Speed: Spark 161, Santro 141, estilo 148,
    0-100 kmph: Spark 13.6 seconds, Santro 16.9, estilo 16.8,

    ANYONE CAN CHECK THESE DETAILS..LOLZ

  65. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 03:05 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    COMPARISION: SPARK V/S ALTO

    LENGTH: SPARK 3495,ALTO 3495
    WIDTH: SPARK 1495,ALTO 1475
    HEIGHT: SPARK 1518,ALTO 1460
    GROUND CLEARANCE: SPARK 170,ALTO 160
    MAX. SPEED; SPARK 161, ALTO 137
    0-100KMPH: SPARK 13.6 SECONDS, ALTO 21.5 SECONDS
    80-O BRAKING: SPARK 32.1 METERS,ALTO 35.8 METERS
    ENGINE: SPARK 1.0L 4-CYL SOHC PETROL,ALTO FC ENGINE
    DISPLACEMENT(CC): SPARK 995,ALTO 796
    POWER (PS@RPM): SPARK 63@5400,ALTO 47@6200
    TORQUE(Nm@RPM):SPARK 90@4200,ALTO 62@3000

    HOW & WHY? LOLZ

  66. on 13 Jul, 2008 at 03:11 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    I GUESS CONFUSION DOOR HO GAYA HOGA? STILL ANY DOUBT? FEEL FREE TO ASK ME! BUT MR. MISHRA THERE IS NOTHING IN UR REVIEW EXCEPT COMMENTS ON LOOKS, WHICH IS PERSONAL, IF U'VE TESTED IT, DEN GIVE THE DETAILS N TELL US UR DRIVING EXPERIENCE, LOOKS R PURELY PERSONAL MATTER, I DONT LIKE THE LOOKS OF SWIFT, DOES DAT MEANS ITS A BAD CAR?? NO ITS A GEM FROM MARUTI! TOO GOOD CAR! BOTH VARIANTS PETROL N DIESEL, N DIESEL ONE IS EVEN BETTER!

  67. on 15 Jul, 2008 at 04:07 PM Mishra

    STILL ONE DOUBT LEFT... WHY LADIES HAVE BEEN TAKING STEROIDS TO DEVELOP MUSCLES? huh..!! LOL

    We may pleased to eat the European SHIT

  68. on 15 Jul, 2008 at 05:45 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    Its your personal opinon Mr. Mishra, You can call it Shit coz Sundarta dekhne wale ki aankhon may hoti hai. LOL

    And I suggest you to ask people Spark is SHIT or what, You will get your answer. The only thing why we hesitate to buy Spark, the Image of World No. 1 is not as good as it should be. But this time GM introduced a car which fits perfectly in indian conditions.. But CRITICS...LOL
    If I will check, May be I will find Sony T.V. in your bedroom instead of Onida, videocon or oscar.

  69. on 15 Jul, 2008 at 05:48 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    And one more point we r here to discuss Cars not to comment on Ladies, Are we? and does that means indian sports galz r taking Steroids to develop muscles and win a medal for our country?? This is ridiculous, Our athletes, discuss throwers, hockey team, wrestlers, weight lifters.. Wat you mean to say?

    If you dont find anything bad in Spark than dont speak shit. Discuss car n personal comments n baseless argues.

    Comparison diya oopar, us par comment karna chahiye tha mishra ji.

  70. on 15 Jul, 2008 at 05:52 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    There is nothing in your review, why I will rate or why others will rate it Helpful ? Write a review, and If I will find it good, Even I will rate it HELPFUL.

  71. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 11:37 AM Osram

    Good review,I myself feel that the original beauty of Matiz has been spoilt in Spark.

  72. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 04:39 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    Dear Osram, U call it review? lolz. . simply u just cant resist Spark n here n there n at my review page coming n saying Spark is bad, Spark is bad, Looks r personal, I like the looks dat means Spark is the bst? No, Purely personal matter dear. Spark is a gem from GM, I completed 15600 kms. and Its a problem free Great Small Car. N i will recommend it to everyone.

  73. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 04:40 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    its like you dont like Aishwarya Rai:)lolz

  74. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 04:42 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    Beauty speak, n little chevy is not UGLY my fren. lol .. yeah if u find any technical problem feel free to tell but dont say again n again dat 20 to 80kmph alto is better coz i tested n on 4th gear i drove spark at 20kmph so no question.. 63 ps of spark v/s 47 ps of alto... lolz .,..u guys r funny!

  75. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 08:42 PM Mishra

    I own a spart; for your kind information...and I have reviewed the car in its every aspects i suppose.. Its if far ahead of competition in its fit and finish, quality, comfort etc etc...I would like point out just two things..Its poor design when compared to Matiz...and its high pricing. Dear friend it falls far below my Verna in design. See i10 its far more superior than its competitors but its poor when indian aesthetic sense is concerned. Honda civic is a great car; but when .....

  76. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 08:44 PM Mishra

    it comes to its beauty it looks like a car after a serious accident. What I am complaining is that European manufactures doesn't look into asia. Hundai launches all its new products in India first. Thanx to Korea. But this white shits doesn't take care of our interests. They simply impose their diseased minds on us. Ford is the greatest example. They sell 15 year old technology in India, just because they know india is after what Sharukh kahan says...lol..

  77. on 17 Jul, 2008 at 08:48 PM Mishra

    GM has to introduce its new models in India, apart from that they also keep their promise the give service background to Matiz. Matiz is a design marvel...Its just beyond all comparisons..when it comes to design. This is my only point. Spark is far ahead of altno or santro..no doubt about it. Yes it is stable at 95 kms/hr, i hv tested...but it is a muscular lady...neither male nor female..

  78. on 18 Jul, 2008 at 07:26 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    Mr. Mishra, if you own a spark then why this kinda review? Looks? If you dont like d looks den why u bought Spark? Amazing coz the first thing any buyer use to consider is Looks!
    And as u mentioned you have reviewed the car in its every aspects... well I dont find anything else den just looks.
    Again you are saying Spark is far ahead of Alto n Santro n very stable.. for ur kind information I tested it at 140kmph n car was stable. N at 20 on 4th gear..no jerk even i tried 5th without any jerk!

  79. on 18 Jul, 2008 at 07:31 PM Rajiv Parashar (Lucknow)

    To me .. Ride & Handling ..Spark is better den other cars of small segment.
    High speed... Low Speed... Interiors.. Comfort.. everything is just perfect! Moreover, Mileage... best in class... though mileage depends on Driving conditions & habits but yes I am getting very good mileage ..better than what I was getting from Santro & Wagon-r.
    The only minus point of Spark.. Service is not available in small towns.. Service?? Maruti beats everyone but THINK MARUTI IS IN D BUSINESS SINCE.... N G.M.?