You are here : Research » User Written Reviews » Honda Accord 3.0 V6 AT » Honda Accord 3.0 V6 AT Reviews

Need a monster heart dressedup executive class wit sum aggressive sportier luks in bonus..V6 is here

A Review by Nitin Sharma on Honda Accord 3.0 V6 AT
25 January, 2007


Average User Rating :
Model Rating  :   9 reviews
Version Rating:   4 reviews
Write a review
User's Ratings for the car

Style
Comfort
Performance
Value for Money
Fuel Economy
 
Overall
Pros : Power machine BEST IN IT'S CLASS, Low road noise, best in class price for a 3lit 221bhp
Cons : Outdated looks..Nahhh..i wnt b writin abt low fuel economy..6-7 is cool enough for 221bhp 3lit beast
Review Popularity

Total Views 5831
People Liked 6
People Disliked 2

Hamm....well Honda Accord  V6 (HA-V6) is a best car you can get in a 20Lks price tag*...for the people who love to stress off the highway....throttle response is very good...Just the thing it lacks is the looks...just outdated compared to it's own Civic and ya many other in its class....then doesnt even give a shit in front of the Style statement TOYOTA CAMRY...but still 6Lks cheaper then CAMRY it hardly need a comparision...


New HA-V6 2007 is much better in terms of  exterior as well as interiors....got a LED tail wit a build in rear spoiler with LED...Side indicators on the side mirrors give a 5star look to this meen power machine...interior gets a Civic touch...dual exhaust at the rear give it a sportier look...


Overall if you have a budget of 20Lks...need a monster heart dressedup executive class with some aggressive sportier looks in bonus...you dont need to go any further....heres the V6 wating for you.


-NITIN SHARMA (nitin1518@gmail.com)


 




Was this review helpful to you ? Yes | No

15 Comment(s) on this Review

  1. on 10 Nov, 2007 at 10:06 PM Aakash 272 (Chandigarh)

    Did you just say it's 6 lakhs cheaper than camry?please head to your nearest toyota showroom to refresh your knowledge.Also about the engine,octavia RS(1.8l 150hp) is ACTUALLY 7 lakhs cheaper and yet faster than accord V-6 besides having real sports features like neon lamps,16-in alloys,sun/moon roof black leather seats etc

  2. on 12 Nov, 2007 at 09:56 PM Nitin Sharma

    Yeah...i think you really need to head to the nearest TOYOTA showroom and check out the prices...OF CAMRY...still for your information...Accord is ONROAD close to 18,50,000. and Camry showroom prise is 23,00,000 and ONROAD price is 26,00,000. it has High texes which increases the ONROAD price.
    Rest as you said about RS. well...RS is 150Ps and it's Just 1.8L...and Accord V6 is 221Ps and 3L...there's a huge diffrence in power. And about RS being faster then Accord.you should know its Automatic.

  3. on 12 Nov, 2007 at 10:01 PM Nitin Sharma

    I mean RS is manual Transmission and Accord is Automatic...and yaa it's true that RS is Faster then accord but still there is a huge difference between RS and Accord...wch u cant really compare. And RS dosnt have NEON lamps...it has XENON'S....so please chek.

  4. on 29 Nov, 2007 at 02:43 PM Aakash 272 (Chandigarh)

    well I live in Chandigarh and here we get a camry for 23L and accord for 18.5,Dunno bout your town.And about the automatic,it is not my mistake that Honda does not know how to make A\T gearboxes.Laura comes with the DSG auto box that gives better fuel eff and performance than even manual(Bugatti veyron[1000hp]uses DSG rather than manual).You won't know that if you stay in Honda world.And yes,thank you for correcting me:RS has Xenon not neon(there are no neon lights).

  5. on 29 Nov, 2007 at 02:50 PM Aakash 272 (Chandigarh)

    one more thing.Pure numbers are not enough to judge a car's performance.Ferrari modena has a 450hp(approx) engine and MITSUBISHI EVO has a 2l 400hp engine(yeah you read that right,it's TWO Litre and was introduced way back in 1999) yet modena did not even make it to the top 10 fastest street legal cars in the world while the EVO was ranked 6(in year 2000).As a friend I suggest you surf the net and get as much info as you can get about all the automotive technology in the world.

  6. on 30 Nov, 2007 at 11:01 AM Aakash 272 (Chandigarh)

    Also give the VW Passat a look.I forgot to tell you the DSG technology belongs to VW .Skoda Bugatti and other european companies BORROW this exceptional tech from VW.Also Passat is a whole lot loaded to the brim with sensors and features you cannot imagine and is almost as fast as Accord V-6.I would say Camry and accord V-6 buyers should give the passat(available in diesel in India) a look.If the interiors of passat look a bit disappointing to you then CAMRY is the one you should go for.

  7. on 10 Jan, 2008 at 02:25 AM Samit (Thane)

    I think u both r absolutly right at your own respective parts but why dont you get it u cannot compare a E CLASS(accord) vehicle with a D Class(skoda R.S) more over R.S stands in the rally sport segment where as an accord is an executive class . No doubt and RS can rip the accord in the initial stage but if u test it in expressway i think R.S will lead way behind. so basically wrong comparison.Now coming upto camry. camry belongs to the same E segment but no value for money for a 2.4ltr.

  8. on 12 Jan, 2008 at 10:22 AM Aakash 272 (Chandigarh)

    I agree with you too Samit.But in which category would you put the 2.0L 18lakh C-rv?It's not about the engine size,but the overall performance.You don't need to buy an accord to quench your speed thirst.Import a 24lakh EVO.It's virtually a supercar with decent luxury.Heck,even sitting in a camry changes the way you see luxury cars.If you think camry is overpriced I can't help you.I'm not saying don't buy accord,I'm just trying to bring down the HYPE around Honda cars(accord doesn't rule!!)

  9. on 31 Jan, 2008 at 01:30 PM Ashish (Gurgaon)

    good points being made by all of you. But as far as engine refinement and revving is concerned nothing can beat accord and yes RS is fractionally quicker than accord till 150-160 and after that accord takes off(no replacement for displacement.VW passat has a very disappointing low end torque and midrange performance is its only selling point in terms of acceleration. Camry on the other hand is CBU import and hence is expensive in comparison to accord however the engine is sadly detuned

  10. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 04:53 PM P

    nitin u sound like chep to skoda rs so y dnt u test drive a honda civic type r mugen..it wil make u frget abt skoda and u will piss ur pants

  11. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 08:16 PM Nitin Sharma

    25th Jan 2007...The day i posted the view on my choice as Accord V6...and today is Jan 31st 2009.
    So the point is as the numbers on the calender have changed drastically considering the technology. I guess what ever you all are sharing your views are true enough but dont you think you should also consider that the review was made long time back and now the technology has changed a lot so no point in discussing on this review unless and until you are taking about the technology available at

  12. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 08:23 PM Nitin Sharma

    that time ?
    @ Akash 272...Well from the start only i am telling that there is no comparison b/w Accord and RS...It was b/w Accord V6 & New Camry. So NO OFFENSES Akash but still going back at the time i posted this review i'll still keep the same views. Ans as you said pure figure dosnt matter "Please dont even think to compare Ferrari & Evo" Note that i didnt write the Model just the company is enough to distinguish both the vehicles under the brand. What ever the figure may be Ferrari will

  13. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 08:30 PM Nitin Sharma

    still be a Ferrari...i am sure almost every one knows what he/she will be buy if they have a choice b/w Ferrari & Evo. I myself praise Evo a LOT, but then when you just add the name Ferrari it means a whole lot different thing. Its just my view !

    @ P.....well i dont own HONDA neither the VW that i would be parsing any of the above for marketing. Its just as a consumer i have put forward my views. Being Automobile crazy and personal plans to buy a car i compared HA & Camry.

  14. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 08:35 PM Nitin Sharma

    about the Cheapness of RS-Octavia...well i have personally experienced Skoda RS-Octavia interior quality. The plastic seems to be cheep. And the other thing is...You will get almost 1L discount on the Octavia RS if you really know to negotiate and Skoda do offer it. I have this experience coz i was personally planning for Skoda Octavia RS & Civic...from witch i ended up with Civic even after i was offered almost a 1L discount on any of the octavias. The reason is not the price its the quality

  15. on 31 Jan, 2009 at 08:40 PM Nitin Sharma

    the overall package you get. You hardly get any discount on Honda stuff. I guess persons having exploring the market must be experiencing the same. So please dont think HM is my company and im downgrading the Octavia RS...its just if you are comparing it with Accord V6 or even the Honda Civic i commented all that.
    & i knw Civic mugen as mch as u knw, personally own Civic 1.8 and i know what mugen will be..which is not actualy a model but an upgrade. So will keep my pants clean. Dont you worry :

Write Your Comment

Please Note: Please be nice, don't be personal in any given cirumstances. If you don't like the review or you think that the information provided is inappropriate, use Report Abuse link just below the review, CarWale.com administrators will take care of it. Any personal attack, harsh comment, abuse or any other kind of offensive comment will be deleted immediately.


Maximum Characters : 4000

Enter the code shown above (If you can't read it: )
Your Email


What's Next
Write your own review Research Accord at CarWale.com
Sell your Accord at CarWale.com Read forum discussions for Accord
Buy used Accord Read blog posts for Accord