Well, I hope I haven’t ‘terrified’ any member by saying that such posts will be ‘deleted’ 
What I actually mean, which I trust most of us understand, is something like (for instance)…
ABC says “A 2nd hand Alto of 2002 is the most likely to suit your budget”.
Now if XYZ says “I agree” OR “Yes, you can’t get another car” & the like, it’s unwarranted for.
Actually XYZ should preferably be saying something like “I agree but would suggest you to consider WagonR/Santro of 1999/2000 – they may come in your budget, and would be better than Alto”.
Someone else may add “It would be even better if you can increase your budget a little & go for WagonR/Santro of 2002 model”.
Like-wise, when ABC gives a good comparison of the cars, XYZ & others may discuss other dimensions & annex various other aspects not covered by him.
Needless to add, 'repetition of views & all that' generally doesn’t arise while disagreeing with each other ;-)
So, there’s nothing so special about it – let us all be a little careful. In the process, the asker will benefit and so will we.
Cheers everybody  |