You are here : Community » Forums » Reviews - Owners & Users » War of the Petrol Hatches
Today's Posts | Search Forums | My Messages

War of the Petrol Hatches

Pages : 1234
#1 12-Aug, 2009 09:23 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Source -

http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/test-drives-initial-ownership-reports/62419-navratna-definitive-comparision-b-segment-petrol-hatchbacks-1-2-1-3-1-4-a.html

Author -

Sidindica

So-which of these 9 gasoline hatches offers the best all round combination of

  1. value
  2. performance
  3. fuel efficiency
  4. safety
  5. space and comfort
  6. ride and handling
  7. style
  8. resale value
  9. after sales service
  10. the overall feel?

These questions, and many more, will be answered in the most comprehensive and the most important comparision ever carried out here.

Yet again-
No ifs and buts.
No half truths.
No true lies.
Just the right winners.
But which one of them ?

The contenders:

1.Hyundai Getz 1.3 alpha (E-3)
2.Hyundai I20 1.2 kappa (E-3/4)
3.Fiat Grande Punto 1.4 Fire (E-4)
4.Honda Jazz 1.2 I-VTEC (E-4)
5.Maruti Swift 1.3 AlTec (E-3)
6.Maruti Ritz 1.2 KB (E-4)
7.Chevrolet Aveo 5 1.2 S-Tec (E-3)
8.Skoda Fabia 1.2 HTP (E-3/4)
9.Tata Indica Vista 1.2 Safire (E-3)

*E-3=Euro 3, E-4=Euro 4, E-3/4=Euro 3 current, Euro 4 ready without any engine tuning.

The parameters:

1.Exterior design
2.Chassis engineering
3.Build quality
4.Interior design and quality
5.Space and comfort
6.Boot space
7.Engine and performance
8.Gearbox
9.Fuel efficiency
10.Ride and stability
11.Handling and braking
12.Buying and owning
13.Final verdict




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#2 12-Aug, 2009 09:25 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Hyundai getz prime 1.3 alpha

List price (ex-showroom Delhi)

  • 1.3 GVS-4,09,000
  • 1.3 GLS-4,29,000
  • 1.3 GLX ABS-4,59,000

What works:

  • Supple low and medium speed ride
  • Space and comfort
  • Flexible interiors
  • Reclning and foldable 60:40 rear seats
  • Sturdy build
  • Flexible 1.3 engine
  • Competant Hyundai service

What needs work:

  • Ordinary styling now appears dated
  • Dull driving experience
  • Cheap beige interiors and wood
  • Below par fuel efficiency
  • Absence of airbags
  • Engine noisy at high revs due to old engine design
  • Poor resale value due to low demand, may get phased out soon.
  • Lacks the “feel good” factor

Hyundai I20 1.2 kappa

List price (ex-showroom Delhi)

  • Magna-4,80,200
  • Asta ABS and Dual Airbags-5,60,201
  • Asta (o) with side and curtain airbags-5,82,200

What works:

  • Contemporary European Design and engineering
  • Safety kit on Asta and 5 star rating
  • Quality interiors
  • Plethora of features
  • Refined kappa engine
  • Respectable mileage for a car of this size
  • Space for 5 people
  • Good boot space
  • Competent Hyundai service

What needs work:

  • Engine wheezes on highway on full load
  • Overtaking manouvers need to be planned
  • Artificial steering feel from motor driven power steering (MDPS)
  • Expensive for a 1.2
  • Flat seats a bit low on comfort
  • Inconsistant ride and handling
  • Resale value suspect

Honda jazz 1.2 I-VTEC

List price (Ex-showroom Delhi)

  • Jazz S MT ABS and dual airbags-6,98,000

What works

  • Most potent and fuel efficient 1.2
  • Resale value and badge
  • Best in class space, comfort and flexible interiors
  • Packaging
  • Biggest boot
  • “magic seats”
  • Flexible i-vtec engine
  • 5 star safety rating
  • Low on maintenance
  • Refinement and eagerness for a car of that size to engine cc ratio
  • Futuristic monovolume space efficient design

What needs work

  • Overpriced
  • Inconsistant after sales service
  • Stripped down model as compared to the competition
  • Shockingly Low on equipment

Skoda Fabia 1.2 HTP

List price (Ex-showroom Delhi)

  • Active Dual airbags-4,90,865
  • Classic Dual airbags-5,24,718
  • Ambiente ABS and Dual airbags-5,88,152
  • Elegence 1.2 ABS and dual airbags-6,40,197

What works

  • Outstanding interior quality and fit and finish
  • Durable body
  • Space and comfort at the rear and good boot space
  • Sturdy at high speeds
  • Safety and security
  • Equipment on elegance
  • Top of class road manners, ride and handling
  • “prestige” of skoda badge which is VW under the skin

What needs work

  • Pathetic and wheezy iron block 3-pot engine
  • Horrible after sales service
  • Poor customer commitment
  • Reliability issues with fabia petrol
  • Electrical glitches persistant
  • Below par petrol’s resale value
  • Unrefined and puny 3 cylinder feels out of sync with a car this expensive
  • Very high maintenance costs
  • Hiccups at low rpm response



My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#3 12-Aug, 2009 09:27 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Chevrolet Aveo 5 S-tec

List Price (Ex-showroom Delhi)

  • Base-3,99,917
  • LS-4,36,037
  • LT with ABS and Driver Airbag-5,48,201

What works

  • Space and comfort for 5
  • Warrenty and maintenance package
  • Clean ride and handling
  • No-nonsence product

What needs work

  • Poor resale value
  • Questionable after sales service at some GM dealers
  • Dull driving experience
  • Engine lacks bottom end torque and flexibility
  • Outdated design of exterior and interor no longer desirable-falls in no man’s land
  • Questionable safety record for a daewoo
  • Small boot space
  • Lacks the “feel” factor in this segment compared to swift.

Maruti Swift 1.3 AlTec

List Price (Ex Showroom Delhi)

  • LXI-3,99,987
  • VXI-4,37,506
  • VXI ABS-4,56,520
  • ZXI ABS and dual airbags-5,15,823

What works

  • Design still looks good after 4 years despite being so common
  • A favourite with youngsters
  • Awesome front seats
  • Sporty Driving position
  • Amazing handling, even with EPS
  • Chuckable city hatch
  • ZXI is VFM for equipment levels
  • Fuel efficiency
  • Resale value
  • Maruti’s aftersales service
  • Flexible engine at high revs, refined and loves to be revved harder.

What needs work

  • Claustrophobic rear seats and windows
  • Small boot
  • Questionable Build quality
  • Squeaks and rattles persistant
  • Engine, though competant, is now outclassed by ritz’s-KB in terms of refinement and flexibility
  • Waiting period
  • Fidgety ride
  • LXI and VXI versions are under-tyred.

Maruti Ritz 1.2 KB

List Price (Ex-Showroom Delhi)

  • LXI-3,90,000
  • VXI-4,20,000
  • VXI-ABS-4,45,001
  • ZXI-4,80,000

What works:

  • Modern Design Chassis aids handling
  • High seating position
  • Amazing front seats
  • Equipment level in ZXI
  • Fabulous KB series engine-refined, flexible and fuel efficient
  • Fantastic value for money
  • Good ride and stability for its size
  • Maruti’s after sales service

What needs work:

  • Controversial rear end design
  • Small boot
  • Cramped rear seat
  • Under tyred
  • Messed up instruments

Tata Indica Vista 1.2 Safire

List price (Ex showroom Delhi)

  • Terra-3,39,544
  • Aqua- 3,64,917
  • Aura-3,89,051

What works-

  • True space and comfort for 5 people
  • Low purchase price
  • Value for money
  • Improved fit anf finish
  • Refined Fiat 1.2 engine
  • Decent ride

What needs work

  • Below par after sales service
  • Poor petrol resale value
  • Low on fuel efficiency
  • Uninspiring performance and subpar driving experience
  • ]Below par interior plastics
  • Styling gets unnoticed despite being only a year old
  • Long term reliability still suspect
  • Under tyred 13 inch wheels look out of place and spoil the overall stance of the car.



My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#4 12-Aug, 2009 09:29 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Fiat Punto 1.4 Fire

List price (Ex showroom Delhi)

  • Dynamic-4,66,562
  • Emotion ABS-5,06,573
  • Emotion pack ABS and dual airbags-5,61,581

What works

  • Amazing european design that turns heads
  • Solid body build quality
  • Best in class ride and handling
  • Tough stance on 15 inch wheels for emotion pack
  • Safety kit and 5 star rating
  • Good boot space
  • Rigid and tough chassis designed for global applications including developing countries that can withstand abuse
  • Competitive price makes it fantastic VFM
  • Features on emotion pack-the only car with bluetooth connectivity
  • “my car” settings and programmable service interval
  • 15,000 kms service interval

What needs work

  • Questionable interior quality
  • Small interior parts falling off
  • Cramped rear legroom
  • High loading sill for the boot
  • Uninspiring performance for claimed output
  • Below par mileage due to heavyweight
  • Questionable after sales service and resale value

Exterior Design:

  • Hyundai getz: 5 /10
  • Hyundai I 20: 7 /10
  • Honda Jazz: 7 /10
  • Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
  • Maruti swift: 7 /10
  • Skoda Fabia: 7 /10
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5: 5 /10
  • Tata Indica Vista: 5 /10
  • Fiat Punto: 8 /10

Make no mistake-all these cars are designed with different philosophies keeping in mind the requirements that originate from their countries of origin.

Guigirio has penned 2 of these designs-the Aveo 5 and the punto. Yes, the aveo 5 was designed in Italy by Italdesign and still it looks decent. But, since that design came in 2000 as Daewoo kalos, it looks pretty outdated and unspiring. The Indian version, launched in 2007, is actually a minor facelifted one with integrated turn lights in headlights and the chevy grille but the front design is devoid of any prescence and reeks 80s. Same goes for the side-other than the 2 character lines, the design goes unnoticed and would never get a second glance. It looks to feminine for our tastes. Same goes for the rear-other than the taillights, the whole design is plane-jane and outdated in serious need of a makeover. That makeover was done in 2007 in europe and Korea and a new interior was added, similar to the aveo sedan but is yet to be launched in India.

On the other hand, the punto, despite being a 4 year old design (first launched in 2005) still looks good, fresh and contemporary devoid of any unnecessary creases and curves. Clearly, Italians believe in simplicity and it works, from the fantastic front with the “mercury drop” headlights to the simplistic contours of the side silhouette to the muscular rear end-makes you want to own one just for the looks alone. Admiration guarenteed!
The Indian Spec Punto has its both front and rear bumpers chopped to meet the “small car” norms and it looks a bit feminine as compared to the European version, but still, it’s a great design and comes in a variety of strking paint shades.




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#5 12-Aug, 2009 09:31 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

The I20, is actually one of better and cohesively designed Hyundais appealing to European tastes. Launched in fall 2008 to replace the getz in European markets, it looks a matured, clean and contemporary design out of their studios in Russelshim, Germany. The front end is however the only standout in an otherwise ordinary shape. Inspired by SLK-it looks striking and has some presence on the road. From the side, it would pass as any french supermini, same from the rear end which resembles the current vauxhall/ opel corsa.The Huge “H” logo which acts as a tailgate opener and the curvy rear bumper are the only striking elements here.

The getz, designed in the same place as the I20, is still sold at a lower price point. Launched in Korea in 2002 and here in 2004, it actually pioneered the supermini B segment in our country but it never really took off. It still looks modern and clean but like the aveo 5, it looks outdated, especially in front of its elder brother, despite the 2007 facelift as the getz prime. The silhouette is OK but dull, especially from the side. The front looks ordinary and the new headlights life it from blandness and the rear resembles the erstwhile daewoo Matiz and looks chunky with the huge bumper but still, it is a design that has aged gracefully and its on its way out.

The Maruti Ritz and swift may share a common platform but are as different as chalk is to cheese.

The swift, launched in 2005 is based on a new suzuki global small car platform with modern mechanicals and was the first car that came with suzuki’s new design language, aimed at youth and sporty crowd. Its radical looks made it a favourite with youngsters and tuners alike, still, after 4 years and 3,50,000 swifts after, it looks fresh, mature and the right car for the Gen Y, making it their default choice. The front is striking with its peeled headlights and huge chunky bumper, the side apes the mini with a 2-box design and the buldging flared wheel arches, and the rear with its boomerang taillights looks different from any other car on the road, a key to its success. It still commands waiting lists that other manufacturers would love to die for.

Similar looking but different in design, the skoda fabia is another European designed supermini based on the roomster platform. Launched in 2007 in Europe and in 2008 in India, it is based on VW groups polo platform and shares many components with it. It is designed to provide robust, durable and reliable motoring to the European masses who aspire to own a VW but cannot afford to. (It’s a different story here, though, as the car was launched in a premium “superhatch” segment).
The front end has typical skoda design cues inspired from the roomster, the side is similar to the swift and the rear is again-more curvy and masculine. The body and finish is amazing and it looks the part.

The other Maruti-the Ritz, or splash as it is called in other markets, does make a splash in the design statement. For a car of its size designed to be tall and practical, it certainly looks the part, especially from the front 3 quarters, where mix of Audi grille and I20 headlights highlight the front end, the curvy and slant windows from the side and boomerang taillights at the rear.
However, the rear end is not so ritzy and has a “smashed up with a sledgehammer” look, clearly not gelling with the font and sides and looks like an afterthought, enough to raise opinion.
Based on a shortened swift platform, it is designed for clean, simple, practical, no frills motoring for families on a budget .




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#6 12-Aug, 2009 09:33 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

The Indica vista may look like an evolution of the indica but is a grounds up redesign launched in 2008. And, its apperance is its biggest problem, too similar and familiar with those triangular headlights, smiling grille and christmas tree taillights, meaning an casual observer would mistake it for just an indica which is enlarged. However, the front is striking, the sides look ordinary and in this safire version, look out of proportion when shod with puny 13 inch wheels. For a car this big, the wheelwells whould have atleast 15 inchers.

Justin Noyrek, of I.DE.A, who designed the vista, has kept the familiar “christmas tree taillight” look at the rear. While it makes up for a clean looking trunklid, it still looks very early 90s. And that’s not necessarily a good thing.

Chassis engineering:
  • Hyundai getz: 6 /10
  • Hyundai I 20: 7 /10
  • Honda Jazz: 8 /10
  • Maruti Ritz: 7 /10
  • Maruti swift: 8 /10
  • Skoda Fabia: 9 /10
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5: 6 /10
  • Tata Indica Vista: 6 /10
  • Fiat Punto: 9 /10
These cars may look similar but are very much different under the skin with varying degrees of stiffness that differentiates the Europeans from the Japanese and the Koreans.

Europeans are still masters in designing rigid and stiff chassis that are of prime importance In developing countries where pathetic roads and poor infrastructure means that these cars are more abused than your average “kantabai” maid.

So, not surprisingly, the punto and fabia are blessed with the gem of a chassis with stiff springs and damper settings for amazing ride quality and road holding at high speeds, with an anti-roll bar at both front and rear for amazing handling at any speed. The skoda’s key to its high speed road manners is the VW groups “C” platform, designed and engineered in South America, where similar roads exist, requiring the use of “rough road package” for maximum stability at any speed.

Ditto for the punto. Based on a SCCS platform shared with the corsa, it was also engineered for South American markets (esp. Brazil, Fiat’s volume market) and South African markets where similar road and weather conditions persist.

The Honda jazz, in its second generation, is also designed keeping the US market in mind and is truly a global product, with a stiff chassis (for a Honda) aimed at optimizing ride comfort while providing neutral handing. It is a good example of packaging marvel. Based on Honda global small car platform shared with the city and insight hybrid, it’s an extremely compact, intelligent and space efficient chassis with simple suspension setups tucked on to the farthest of the monocoque. Same goes for the wheels-tucked far off to generate maximum passenger space.

The Hyundai I20 follows a similar chassis design philosophy as the jazz but is designed more towards easy driving than sporty handling, key to markets in Europe. It is a new generation PB chassis, more stiff than the jazz’s though in terms of packaging and space it does fall short, despite of having a long wheelbase than the Honda’s. All in all, it follows a conventional chassis trend as with any other European supermini of today, nothing groundbreaking.



My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#7 12-Aug, 2009 09:34 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

The older Korean duo, the getz and the Aveo 5, are actually similar cousins under the skin. Since both of these cars were launched in 2001-2002, to compete with each other in the global markets, a lot of things have changed since like stringent safety standards, new generation design philosophies, tougher mileage and environmental norms etc and both these cars are clearly outclassed in this department. The chassis, though stiff is not so contemporary in design as compared to the others, safety features are questionable and even though both these cars have more interior space than the swift and ritz, the chassis design is pretty convectional and dated, more so in the case of the chevy.

The Swift and ritz are based on the same platform, but one is designed for the enthusiast and the other for practical, family oriented nature.
The swift follows the suzuki’s new global RBSS chassis philosophy with suspension bits inspired from the junior WRC like the stiff spring and damper rates, performance shockers and lightweight rigid chassis aided to improve handling and makes it for a superb chuckable city hatch.

Since the ritz is designed as a tall boy, making maximum use of available space vertically, and it is based on the same swift platform but with a smaller wheelbase, maintaining high speed stability was a challenge for Suzuki’s engineers and they added a thicker anti roll bar and softer spring and damper rates for better ride comfort since this is designed for urban families who want simple, no frills motoring.

The Indica Vista is designed on Tata motors’ second generation passenger car platform and shares nothing in common with the earlier Indica. In fact, for cost savings and in an effort to maximize passenger space and comfort, Tata has adopted for a more conventional torsion beam suspension in favour of the current Indi’s independent rear suspension as this configuration is much more simpler to manufacture and low on maintenance. The wheel wells can accommodate 13 inch to 15 inch wheels depending upon the version, however, the 13 inch wheels provided in the petrol clearly spoils the stance of the car and also does not help in high speed stability.
Otherwise, the new chassis is rigid, more for abuse than driving pleasure as Indica owners tend to abuse their cars ever so often. Overall, it is simple, rugged and easy on maintenance, just what an average Indian car buyer wants.

Build Quality:

  • Hyundai getz: 7 /10
  • Hyundai I 20: 8 /10
  • Honda Jazz: 7 /10
  • Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
  • Maruti swift: 6 /10
  • Skoda Fabia: 9 /10
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5: 6 /10
  • Tata Indica Vista: 7 /10
  • Fiat Punto: 8 /10

In our country, since cars are abused in every possible way and due to our road conditions and infrastructure, cars need to be solidly built to withstand rigorous abuse.which means les squeaks and rattles, durable body and underpinnings as the car racks up the kilometers in coming years.

It is this parameter that no one manufacturer has understood better than skoda and closely, fiat.




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
Last Updated: 12-Aug, 2009 09:35 PM, by bhardwaj
0 members liked this post
 
#8 12-Aug, 2009 09:36 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16
The fabia easliy tops this stakes with a soild rigid bodyshell made from thicker gauge steel and superbly finished in 7 coats of high gloss paint.Every panel, every nut and bolt feels well screwed together and panel gaps are even and consistent.Not surprising considering the high asking price and the standards we have come to expect from skoda.

Following closely on the heels of skoda is Fiat punto, again built from sturdy materials such as high strength steel for the body with a similar thicker gauge as the fabia’s. Shut the door and the “thunk” like sound of its vault like body always feel special. The body, as with all fiats, feels rigid and durable to withstand abuse and while driving it, you get a feeling of safety and security that makes cars like swift, ritz and aveo feel like a tin can in comparision.

Hyundai’s I20 again has been designed keeping in mind the needs of quality conscious Europeans and despite being built in India for global markets, quality feels on par with the Europeans. Though the body may lake structural rigidity of the punto and fabia, build, fit and finish is excellent for the asking price and the body feels well screwed together.

Its little brother, the getz, is not badly built either, as owner feedback has shown for the pst 5 years it has been on our roads. Though better than the marutis, it is outclassed by Hyundai’s own I20, leave alone the Europeans. Though the body remains rattle free, remember that it is essentially a 7 year old design meaning that safety standards are not on par with today’s cars.

Honda’s new supermini, the jazz, has a solid feeling that was not prevailing with previous Hondas, but compared to Euro hatches, it lacks the solid feels and comes with typical Japanese lightweight, though rigid bodyshell. Honda’s “G-CON” technology does play a pivotal role in safety but the body build does not feel confidence inspiring. Its too early to comment on its long term durability but still, it will perform without fuss on our roads, the body largely remaining rattle free which plagues most marutis.

And unfortunately, inconsistent build quality forms a part of Maruti ownership experience. High demand and volume production with enormous pressure due to waiting periods have taken its toll on the build quality of both its cars-the swift and ritz.

The ritz, being better built of the 2 marutis, is expectd to last more onger than its elder sibling, the swift which unfortunately suffers from early squeaks and rattles in early stages, as felt by many owners. Panel gaps are wide and inconsistent on both marutis and it does not give you a “built to last” feeling as compared to some other cars. Quality of bumpers in both cars is questionable since they can easily break apart when towed. Same goes for doors which can produce a dent even when hit slightly.
Replacement of door hinges at least 2-3 times is part of ownership experience and its high time that maruti pays attention to this problem.

As compared to marutis, the aveo (2000 daewoo kalos) feels well screwed together-but only just. The body lacks torsional rigidity of even its rival-the getz and rattles do creep in after about 7-8000 kms. But its safety features are questionable as the car has only earned 2 stars from Euro NCAP. The body panels feel light and tinny and do not feel as if they would last longer.

The Indica Vista is built using new modern robotized manufacturing processes at Tata-Fiat plant in ranjangaon in pune and as a result, it marks a quantum leap over the earlier Indica with a superb paint finish, consistent panel gaps and streamlined body finish which feels more durable. However, it loses points for absence of safety features like ABS and airbags.



My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#9 12-Aug, 2009 09:38 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Interior design and quality

  • Hyundai getz: 6 /10
  • Hyundai I 20: 7 /10
  • Honda Jazz: 7 /10
  • Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
  • Maruti swift: 6 /10
  • Skoda Fabia: 8 /10
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5: 5 /10
  • Tata Indica Vista: 5 /10
  • Fiat Punto: 6 /10

As with the exterior, the fabia leads the way with outstanding interior design and finish. The dashboard is simple and ergonomically laid out, with all controls being logically laid out and falling easy on driver’s hands. The dimpled plastic on elegance looks simply superb and feels built to last, same for AC vents. Every lever,screw, nut and bolt feels expensive and precisely fit and finished together. Even the dials are superbly designed and clear to read. The door pads follow a similar, high quality design with all controls falling easily in hand.

Compared to the city, the jazz’s interiors feel actually better finished and made of high quality material. For interior design and practicality, it’s a case study for other manufacturers to follow. Honda’s engineers have designed the interiors in such a way that every possible square inch has been carved out for storage space. No less than 10 cup and bottle holders are available, storage spaces abound here and there and the dashboard design is itself futuristic and feels like a cockpit design. The AC controls are intuitive and easy to operate, so as the audio controls on the steering wheel. Superb ergonomics and the best of all, it offers flexibility like no other hatch tested. Its rear seats not only fold 60:40, but also tumble and fold in a manner that you can carry a bicycle!or a flower pot! Yes, we are discussing the “magic seats” feature. However, absence of certain equipment like dead pedal, parcel tray, ACC etc is shocking on a car costing this much.

The I20’s interiors may have a dull design but are superbly finished and the two-tone beige and brown interior scheme feels airy and luxurious, if not to everyone’s taste. However, the dashboard feels a bit old school with convectional stereo and vertical AC vents, even though ergonomically it is superb, especially the toggle type audio controls on the steering wheel. The door pockets are big and glove box is deep and cooled, superb attention to detail, so are the tell-tale signs displayed on the mini screen on top of the dashboard.

Compared to the i20, the getz’s dashboard looks outdated and very 80s with boxy rectangular design and square door pads. Though finish is decent, the beige interiors look downmarket and feel cheap, not helped by the tacky wood finish which looks more like it is glued onto the console. Ergonomics are decent bu the overall design is bland. Earlier cars came with black interiors (pictured) which looked a bit sporty. Not these ones.

Same goes for aveo. It feels like a prehistoric cave in comparison. The expanses of grey not doing any favour either. It lacks any design flair of the current hatches and looks like nothing but an enlarged 1998 daewoo matiz interior. Finish is decent but the carbon fibre finish feels tacky and out of sync. Though the design is a bit practical, it doesn’t feel that special either. What it clearly needs is new interiors a-la aveo sedan that currently does duty in the new aveo 5 worldwide.




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
#10 12-Aug, 2009 09:39 PM
Bhardwaj
Legend
Joined Date: 10 Jul 2009
Location: Hyderabad
Posts: 2061
Likes: 16

Both the marutis-the swift and the ritz follow a similar interior theme-black and sportiness. The swift’s dashboard is well designed and wraps around the driver nicely, giving it a sporty feeling. It is also somewhat better built as compared to the previous marutis but still has its work cut out. In the ZXI version, the integrated audio looks superb and gels well with the dash, so do some splashes of silver. However, at the rear due to small windows, it feels claustrophobic and does not impart a feeling of airiness. Storage space above the dashboard is wasted, though there is a big shelf to store CDs and also, two cupholders abound. Door pockets, though large are slim and do not solve any purpose either.

The ritz has a more practical design of the two and even though the dashboard is inspired from the CR-V, it looks superb with the integrated stereo on the ZXI. It has superb ergonomics, decent storage spaces and is finished in generally high quality for a car of the asking price, but the instruments are a mess. The speedometer, inspired from the mini cooper, is large but too much dials make it difficult to read, so does the digital fuel gauge, which is just too small and belongs more to a bike than a car. The pop up tachometer is again a design statement which looks cool but is difficult to read on a moving vehicle due to its small size.

The Indica vista, however is a design disaster with surprisingly poor ergonomics and almost devoid of any usable storage space, save for the huge glove box and a small tray under the co-driver’s seat. In an attempt to save costs for left and right hand drive markets, the centre console is poorly designed and AC controls are way bottom, and also the console fouls with the driver’s knee. The door pockets are too small on a car this big and claims that it is designed for Indians. The central dials look decent but again, the tacho is too small to read easily.
However, the biggest problem lies with the fit and finish of the interior plastics. Though quality has improved by leaps and bounds, it is still way behind other cars compared here. Some parts still feel flimsy and feel that they will break apart due to repeated usage and some panels are not well screwed together, sadly a tata trademark.

The punto again doesn’t do badly as far as interiors are concerned but quality feels short as compared to the Skoda and Honda. Though the dashboard is superbly designed and feels like an aircraft cockpit with amazing ergonomics, it is let down by inconsistent fit and finish, especially in the areas like the steering wheel and seat latches. The storage spaces, though plenty, are not well executed either with shallow cup holders and small door pockets.
The main concern is lack of quality control and lack of it keeps popping around, as in this case, the parcel tray lock fell off mysteriously (shown in the pic). For the asking price, better quality interiors are expected and hope fiat takes care of this soon.

Space and comfort:

  • Hyundai getz: 7 /10
  • Hyundai I 20: 8 /10
  • Honda Jazz: 9 /10
  • Maruti Ritz: 6 /10
  • Maruti swift: 6 /10
  • Skoda Fabia: 8 /10
  • Chevrolet Aveo 5: 7 /10
  • Tata Indica Vista: 8 /10
  • Fiat Punto: 7 /10

Since these cars are classified as “super minis”, and they are considered to be an alternative to entry level sedans, packaging plays a pivotal role as in our country, though these cars are strictly 4 or 5 seaters, accommodating an entire brood of your in-laws, grand children and even pets is not uncommon, as seen in many small




My Punto http://ndtvauto.carwale.com/forums/ViewThread-9707.html
0 members liked this post
 
Pages : 1234