Dear manish,
in my case, thhe accident is only on the rear and front surface (bumpers, fenders, bonnet, windshield etc) No problem with the engine and other running parts. In fact I drove the car after the accident to the police and then the ASC. No chassis or frame damage. So the car is quite repairable.
The IDV is 90 K and the repair cost will come to abt Rs. 75 - 80K. Here, the insurance company will have to pay abt 50K. The surveyor informed that eventhough their liability is well below 75% of IDV, the company will still go for total loss since the scrap quote is Rs. 50k and then they will have to pay only Rs.40K instead of the repair cost of 50 to 55K.
Can the insurance company do this? I mean. if their liability is well below 75% of the IDV, can they still go for total loss since it is cheaper for them? In this case, I think the ASC is trying to buy the car for scrap rate, repair and sell for profit. Previously, the ASC had offered to take the car as is for Rs.70K if I go for new santro GL pLus. Since I want a diesel car in future, I declined.
How do I tackle this? For now, I have told to go ahead with the repairs since the insurer has survayed the damage. Then I plan to claim with the bills. Since I plan to use the car for another year, it is profitable to me to repair. But I need to know if the insurance company can claim total loss in this case and not pay the extra 10k liability for repairs.
Requesting advise to tackle this issue.
|