Posted by vaibhav_delhi
Thnx for the link to comparison Dwarika but stability and wheel base is not what you need in a car, in these terms Ambassador is the best but I know even you will not go for it.
I am talking about the whole package where Ritz is far better tha Figo in terms of service back up,brand image, road presence.
Hi Vaibhav,
i agree that the facts would vary from person to person as the need is different for individuals. I took rigorous test drive of both Figo and Ritz before I decided for Figo. Ritz lacks with LOT of functionalities and features as compared to Figo. It does not come with an airbag while costing almost the same as Figo. It has thinner tires compared to Figo which is a safety factor. It lacks handling in corners which again a safety factor. It has soft suspension which is supposed to give more comfort but it does not as compared to Figo. Its clutch is too hard to press which is bad for city driving.
BUT these are my observations. And because I found Figo better so I bought. If I had money then I would have selected the Polo over Figo. The points I spoke about could be pointless for some one else.
About service I dont agree that Maruti is good anymore. I own 2 Maruti cars and what I see is their quality has gone down, service fee increased and spare availability is also an issue. Same thing I notice with Hyundai with experience from friends and relatives.
Ford, Chevrolet and Volkswagen on the other hand are doing just the opposite by offering better service.
Just my 2 cents.
Sharma faced the problem with exterior which I never faced but I had opted for underbody and outer body protection. Again this is far cheaper with Ford over Maruti. Yes I could observe the bumper is too soft. Not sure if it is good or bad but I am not so comfortable with it.
Cheers
Dwarika
|