I think the vehicle was too ahead of its time
Only Palio had the space UVA provided, and Palio had been a failure of sorts in the earlier avatar of Fiat.
The main reason why the first crop of luxury hatches failed is the pricing - Indians think simplistically and for them, to shell out as much money for a hatch as for a sedan is sacrilage. When Palio was introduced, it was priced 5.25L or something like that, and at that time, Esteem VXi was priced at 5.5L. People thought Fiat was mad to have priced a hatch that much. Uno, a spartan but spacious hatch by Fiat costed considerably lower.
UVA was named the car of the year by one of the prestigeous awards (Don't recall who it was) but Chevy has not expanded its dealer network even in metros sufficiently for the users to feel assured of service. They have not built a confidence in the general public about their ability to compete with the major car mfrs, like Maruti. No one wants to be left holding the basket when it comes to paying top money for their cars, and the volume of cars and the dealer network size did not inspire people to patronize the mfr to sufficient degree. Even Aveo suffered on this account. It was only after the smashing success of Spark (incidentally not an original Chevy model) that paved the way to eventual assured survival of Chevy in Indian market. By then UVA was already long in the tooth, and on its way to be labeled as a failure.
So goes the sob story of UVA. Nothing to do with the car technically as such.
|