People have genuinely put their Reviwes and personal experiences in last few posts[Although i am not a judge but feel more honoured to have some honest replies to posts] and i agree with all except "KEEPING HONDA FOR 6-7YRS"
Engine =no problem,But makeover so frequent does affect Car image,And the older version owners feel more Sidelined keeping apart lesser value in the market when you sell your old version when the time comes for a Vehicle change.
Its just purely out of the scenario i have seen with all HONDA vehicles ,from CRV -CIty-Civic.
HONDA simply dont feel like giving up just because they know they have Somewhat superior vehicle engine but not the best in looks.
Agreed that Market trends change,But i dont see that happening frequently with other manufacturers.
Even if SX4 or Optra or Verna manages to sell 1/3rd of the total of HONDA,i feel its pretty decent enough.
If at all they wish to give more to people,they should launch a completely diff vehicle keeping their engines same.[Imagine Naming Kizashi as SX4 2]
Which nevertheless never happens.
Customers are at the recieving end and they should give them due importance.
They exist because of customers and demand by them.
Then why not deliver them what they want.
And yes i disagree to anyone who says maintenance on HONDA is anyway cheaper to any of the MAnufacturers,Not even close.
They treat you royaly and do charge you with the same margin,Which otherwise cant be cheaper than manufacturers who get their spare parts made in india.
Success is not final, failure is not fatal: it is the courage to continue that counts.